Previous Council Item

Next Council Item Corresponding Agenda
List of Council Meetings List of Reports to Council Sunnyvale Home Page

 

RTC#02-195

May 21, 2002

SUBJECT:

Program Status Report and Recommended Guidelines for the Down Payment Assistance Component-Housing for Public School Employees, City Employees and Child Care Teachers Program (HPCC)

REPORT IN BRIEF

This report provides the implementation status of the Housing for Public School Employees, City Employees and ChildCare Teachers Program (HPCC) and recommended guidelines and eligibility criteria for implementation and participation in the Down Payment Assistance component of the HPCC program.

BACKGROUND

As a top priority for study in 2001, the Sunnyvale City Council directed staff to explore "options for affordable housing for teachers and City employees". From January through June an interdepartmental team developed options for Council to consider ways to enhance affordable housing for City and school district employees. This report was presented to the City Council on June 19, 2001 (RTC 01-220). City Council approved several elements outlined in the report for staff implementation during 2001 and 2002.

On October 9, 2001, Council approved Budget Modification Number 2 to begin the implementation process of the Housing for Public School Employees, City Employees and Child Care Teachers Program (RTC 01-351), and on January 15, 2002, Council approved guidelines for the implementation of the rental assistance and educational components. The final component is the down payment loan program to assist first time home ownership.

The rental assistance component includes the implementation of a Security Deposit Loan Program to assist employees to obtain rental housing. Staff began the outreach efforts for this program in March, and at present four security deposit loans have been made. All four loans were funded to City employees.

The education component includes a series of specialized homebuyer education classes and creation of a website that will provide available information on housing assistance programs and training. The educational classes began this February. As of April 30, six four-hour classes have been held. More than three hundred people have attended. Of those who attended, 37% are City employees, 47% are school district employees and 16% are childcare workers. The website is under construction and will be operational by the end of May.

Staff is now prepared to implement the Down Payment Loan component of the HPCC program. Since December, staff has worked with D.R. Elrod and Associates to research and develop recommendations for the Down Payment Loan component of the HPCC Program. The following actions have been completed:

  1. Research a variety of Bay Area or California first-time homebuyer programs, including any that specifically relate to teacher/public employee housing.
  2. Obtain sample documents for review, including promissory notes, deeds of trust, affordability restrictions, and program statements.
  3. Develop a matrix of programs to compare various components among jurisdictions.

Staff met with school district representatives about the programs. The proposed program guidelines have been developed in cooperation with each school district’s representative.

EXISTING POLICY

Land Use and Transportation Sub-Element (1997)

GOAL C2: Ensure ownership and rental housing options in terms of style, size, and density that are appropriate and contribute positively to the surrounding area.

Housing and Community Revitalization Sub-Element (1992):

GOAL A: Foster the expansion of the housing supply to provide greater opportunities for current and future residents given environmental, social, fiscal, and land use constraints.

GOAL C: Promote and maintain a diversity in tenure, type, size, location and cost-of-housing to permit a range of individual choice for all current residents and those expected to become city residents as a result of normal growth processes and employment opportunities.

C.3.a. The City should consider direct City and public financial involvement in housing programs, including City bonding resources and possible submission of an Article 34 election to voters if needed.

DISCUSSION

Staff has researched the loan programs underway in the following jurisdictions:

Jurisdiction

Program

City of Oakland

Public Safety Officer/Teacher Down Payment Assistance Program

City of Oakland

First-Time Homebuyers Mortgage Assistance Program

City of San Jose

Teacher Homebuyer Program

City of San Mateo

Countywide Home Investment Partnership (CHIP)

County of San Mateo

START (Second Mortgage)

County of San Mateo

StartPLUS (secured Third Mortgage)

County of Santa Clara

Teacher MCCs

County of Santa Clara

Housing Bond Trust Fund Second Mortgage

County of Santa Clara (SVMG)

Deferred $6,500 Assistance Program

State of California (CHFA)

Extra Credit Teacher Home Purchase Program (operated through SCC Teacher MCCs, above)

State of California (CHFA)

High Cost Area Home Purchase Assistance Program (HiCAP) --First Loan

State of California (CHFA)

High Cost Area Home Purchase Assistance Program (HiCAP) --Second Loan

State of California (CHFA)

CHAP 100% Loan Program

These jurisdictions were selected for review because they either offered a first-time homebuyer loan program specifically for teachers and/or public employees, or because their general first-time homebuyer program has proven successful and could be transferable, in whole or in part, to the City of Sunnyvale. For each jurisdiction, copies of Council/Board reports, deeds of trust, promissory notes, program information, eligibility criteria and similar documents were obtained and analyzed.

Our analysis reveals that the following generalities can be drawn:

The County of Santa Clara’s CASA program is a good example of what does not work in a first time homebuyer program. According to one of the managers of the program, Knaphtali Knox, the County’s CASA program closed after just two years, with only five loans closed during that time [the City contributed $100,000 in Housing Mitigation Funds to this program, most of which has been returned].

He cites a number of reasons for the failure of the program, such as loan amounts that were insufficient to substantially aid the borrower in affording a home, intimidating equity share provisions, and income limits that were too low to attract a reasonable pool of applicants.

With respect to this last issue, in order for the program’s sole lender to receive CRA credit, the lender initially required borrowers to be less than 80% of median (low income), and not a single loan was closed that first year. Although median income at the time of the program’s inception was nearly $90,000 for a family of four, 80% of median was simply too low to attract any eligible borrowers. And, while the lender adjusted the income requirements to 100% of median for the program’s second year, it was still not high enough, with only five loans closing in total. Mr. Knox suggested that a more viable income limit would have been 120% of median, which in fact is generally the standard for most jurisdictions’ first-time homebuyer programs.

Based on the research undertaken, those jurisdictions that do specifically target teachers and/or public service employees have program parameters that do not meet the City of Sunnyvale’s needs in terms of loan amount, loan terms, return on investment, and similar factors. A brief summary follows.

Program

Concerns

City of Oakland’s Public Safety Officer/Teacher Down Payment Assistance Program

Loan amount ($10,000) considered too low to be an effective tool for potential first-time buyers.

City of San José Teacher Homebuyer Program

Borrower cannot own primary residence but can own rental property to qualify; 0% loan with no repayment for 30 years; can retain loan even if the teacher is no longer employed by the schools; 100% loan-to-value accepted.

County of Santa Clara’s Teacher MCC Program

A variant of the existing Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, not a true loan program; maximum purchase price restrictions; income eligibility to 100% of median only; must be a teacher in a "low performing school" selected by the State (includes only Downtown San José).

We have determined that a combination of the programs offered by the City and County of San Mateo hold the most promise for the City of Sunnyvale to utilize in the development of its first-time homebuyer program. Although neither of these jurisdictions’ programs specifically target teachers and/or public service employees, their loan provisions and requirements respond effectively to the unique housing and economic conditions facing potential borrowers in the Bay Area today. These are highly successful programs that have attracted much interest from potential borrowers in the last few years.

We recommend that the following criteria be adopted for the City of Sunnyvale’s program:

  1. Maximum loan amount of $50,000. Jurisdictions with the most successful programs have found that the loan amounts have to be high enough to make a sizeable impact on the down payment and/or the overall purchase price.
  2. Maximum income 120% of median. Setting the criteria at 120% of median, rather than just 100% of median or below will allow a broader pool of potential applicants and will allow the City to assist a wider range of eligible borrowers.
  3. Borrowers may not have owned a primary residence in Santa Clara County during the last three years. Applicants would be allowed to have owned a primary residence in locations outside of Santa Clara County. This provision serves as a means to recruit teachers or public employees from outside the area.
  4. Borrowers may purchase a home within the following Cities: Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Santa Clara, Saratoga, Los Altos, Mountain View, and San Jose (includes Alviso).
  5. Home must be owner-occupied. The borrower may not rent out the unit to others; the subject property must be the borrower’s primary residence.
  6. No maximum purchase price; price to be determined by what the borrower is able to afford. It is assumed that lenders will qualify borrowers for a first loan that establishes the affordable housing price in a ratio of 35% to 40% of the borrower’s gross household income to housing cost and debt, which is the standard in the private market.
  7. Interest rate of 5.5%, fully amortized but with deferred payments until the fifth year of the loan. This provision allows the borrower to become accustomed to monthly mortgage payments for a period of five years before payments on the City loan commence. The interest rate is equal to the current return earned on fund accounts. Interest accrual during the five year deferral period will be determined on a sliding scale of 0%-5.5% depending on the borrower’s need to increase their housing cost to income ratio so they may qualify for the first loan. The monthly payment beginning in year six to amortize a $50,000 City loan over the next twenty-five years will be $392 per month. This is equal to an additional 12% increase compared to the estimated average initial monthly payment.
  8. Maximum Loan-to-Value ratio of 95%; borrower must be able to contribute up to 5% down payment. Although the City may request borrowers contribute a full 5% to the down payment, some flexibility should be allowed for certain situations where the down payment is simply too large for the borrower to contribute. At a minimum, borrowers should be expected to contribute 3% to cover closing costs, etc.
  9. Total loan term of 30 years. This is a standard term for the City’s loans.
  10. Equity share provisions, up to the first ten years of ownership.  Staff suggests that the City include some equity share provisions, should a borrower substantially default on the loan – say, if the borrower rents out the subject property contrary to the terms of the loan or if sold within the first five years. This is meant to act as a deterrent to an early sale to generate "windfall" profits.
  11. The City will include decreasing equity share rights if the borrower sells the subject property between year five and year ten of the loan term. In this way, the equity share provisions would be an inducement to the borrower to remain in the program for as long as possible. The terms may include waiver of the equity share if transfer is made to an income eligible household, if the sale is due to hardship, or due to involuntary termination of employment. The following is an example of the proposed equity share formula:

    Original Purchase Price = $450,000 City Loan = $50,000 = 11% equity share.

    Years held before resale

    % Equity Share

    Gross Proceeds

    Due City

    One to Five Years

    11%x200= 22%

    $40,000

    $8,800

    Sixth Year

    11%x180= 19.8%

    $40,000

    $7,920

    Seventh Year

    11%x160= 17.6%

    $40,000

    $7,040

    Eight Year

    11%x140= 15.4%

    $40,000

    $6,160

    Nine Year

    11%x120= 13.2%

    $40,000

    $5,280

    Ten Year

    11%x100= 11%

    $40,000

    $4,400

  12. Borrower must be either:
    1. Employee (permanent, full-time) employed by a school district serving Sunnyvale and assigned to a school where the majority of students are residents of Sunnyvale; or
    2. Full time (permanent) public employee of City of Sunnyvale.
    3. Qualified child care provider who is working at State-licensed childcare center located within the City of Sunnyvale or childcare centers for school-aged children operated by a school district within the City of Sunnyvale who meet the income criteria. The teacher must be qualified to teach under State Title 22 requirements.
  13. City Employees, school district employees and qualified child care providers must have successfully completed their probationary period before being eligible for a loan in this program.
  14. The City will pre-qualify and maintain a list of lenders to work in this program, and borrowers may obtain their first loans only through this list. The City has begun developing a list of potential lenders, using information gleaned from other programs such as the County’s now-defunct CASA program, the Housing Trust Fund, the City of San José’s Teacher Homebuyer Program and the San Francisco Workforce Initiative. Staff will undertake a formal solicitation process, during the next month, to meet with and select lenders whose loan products will work well with the City’s Down Payment Loan Program.

The following scenarios illustrate the impact of the proposed program. The following two tables show that, based on a purchase price of $450,000 (approximately median purchase price) and a down payment of 5%, the City’s loan would effectively reduce the amount of the purchase price so that a household with just $86,100 annual income could afford to purchase the subject home. Without the City loan, a household would need $97,500 to purchase the same home.

Scenario 1: Borrower Receives $50,000 City Loan

$450,000

Purchase price

($22,500)

Downpayment

($50,000)

City loan

$377,500

Amount borrower must finance

$2,512

Monthly payment

$91,345

Income needed to finance (based on housing payments = 33% of income)

Scenario 2: Borrower Receives No City Loan

$450,000

Purchase price

($22,500)

Downpayment

$0

City loan

$427,500

Amount borrower must finance

$2,844

Monthly payment

$121,885

Income needed to finance (based on housing payments = 28% of income)

These scenarios illustrate that the City could potentially reach a significantly lower income pool of applicants with its loan than were such applicants afforded no such loan. Attached to this report are additional scenarios showing the impact of using different purchase prices ($450,000, $375,000 and $300,000) at 33% and at 28% of housing cost to income.

Staff recommends that the City’s funding allocation for loans be limited to $500,000 for the first year of the program. During that time, staff will gain sufficient experience working with the program to identify shortcomings or programmatic weaknesses. After the first year of implementation, staff will be better able to assess the demand for loans from the targeted participants and any guidelines that may require modification. However, should initial demand greatly exceed expectations or other deficiencies arise, staff will report these issues to Council for correction as soon as they are known.

FISCAL IMPACT

Council action will have no fiscal impact. Funds were appropriated for $719,912 on October 9, 2001 (RTC 01-351) for the implementation of the assistance programs.

PUBLIC CONTACT

Public contact was made through posting of the Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, posting of the agenda and report on the City’s web page, and the availability of the report in the Library and the City Clerk’s Office.

ALTERNATIVES

The key areas to be determined to begin the implementation of the program include the loan terms and eligibility criteria that are described in items 1 through 13 of this report.

  1. Adopt the eligibility criteria and loan terms as described in items 1-13 of this report.
  2. Alter, modify, insert or delete any and all eligibility criteria and loan terms described in items 1-13 of this report and any other terms City Council may choose to include.

The City Council may take no action.

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends Alternative 1.

Prepared by:
Annabel Yurutucu
Housing Officer

Reviewed by:
Robert Paternoster
Director, Community Development

Approved by:
Robert S. LaSala
City Manager

Attachments

  1. Teacher/Public Employee Affordability Analyses

 

Previous Council Item

Next Council Item Corresponding Agenda
List of Council Meetings List of Reports to Council Sunnyvale Home Page