CITY OF SUNNYVALE
REPORT
Planning Commission
July 8, 2002
|
SUBJECT: |
Jerry & Shirley Chen [Applicant/Owner]: Application for a 11,000 square foot site located at 448 Crescent Avenue in an R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential/Planned Development) Zoning District. (APN:211-35-100): |
|
Motion |
2002-0312 - Special Development Permit to allow the construction of three units; |
|
Motion |
2002-0312 - Parcel Map to subdivide an existing lot into four lots. |
REPORT IN BRIEF
|
Existing Site Conditions |
Single Family House with accessory utility building |
|
Surrounding Land Uses |
|
|
North |
Multi-family Apartments |
|
South |
Single Family Houses |
|
East |
Multi-family Condominiums |
|
West |
Multi-family Condominiums |
|
Issues |
Subdivision and In-fill Development |
|
Environmental Status |
A Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. |
|
Staff Recommendation |
Approve with Conditions |
![]() |
PROJECT DATA TABLE
|
EXISTING |
PROPOSED |
REQUIRED/PERMITTED |
|
|
General Plan |
Medium Density Residential |
Same |
|
|
Zoning District |
R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential, Planned Development) |
Same |
--- |
|
Lot Size (s.f.)*** |
11,000 |
Lot 1: 2,819 |
8,000 min. |
|
Lot With (f.t.)*** |
60 |
Lot 1: 41 |
120 |
|
Gross Floor Area (s.f.) |
Project Total: |
Project Total: 5,997 |
N/A |
|
Lot Coverage (%)*** |
36.9% |
Project Total: 33.7% |
40% max. |
|
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) |
36.9% |
Project Total: |
No max in Zoning Code; Small-lot guidelines suggest an overall 50% project FAR. |
|
No. of Units |
1 |
3 |
6 max. |
|
Density (units/acre) |
4 du/ac |
12 du/ac |
24 du/ac max. |
|
Meets 75% min? |
No |
No |
4 min. |
|
Bedrooms/Unit |
2-bedroom |
Lot 1: 3-bedroom |
|
|
Unit Sizes (s.f.) |
1,049 |
Lot 1: 2,073 |
N/A |
|
No. of Buildings On-Site |
2 |
3 |
--- |
|
Distance Between Buildings |
30 ft. |
26 ft. |
23 ft. min. |
|
Building Height (ft.) |
16-0" |
24-6" |
30 ft. max. |
|
No. of Stories |
1 |
2 stories + |
2 max. |
|
Setbacks (facing prop.) |
|||
|
21 |
Project: |
15 avg. min. |
|
12 |
Project: 8 |
6 min./ 15 total |
|
3 |
Project: 8 |
6 min./ 15 total |
|
11 |
Project: 16-10" |
10 min. if encroachment into yard is less than 25% of yard size. |
|
Landscaping (sq. ft.) |
|||
|
5,000 |
2,650 |
1,275 min. |
|
5,000/unit |
883/unit |
500 /min. |
|
3,500 s.f. |
450 s.f./ unit |
400 s.f. /unitmin. |
|
Parking |
|||
|
0 |
8 |
8 min. |
|
0 |
6 |
6 min. |
|
10 |
19-0" |
18 min. |
***Deviations from SMC requirements
ANALYSIS
Background
Previous Actions on the Site: The following table summarizes previous planning applications related to the subject site.
|
File Number |
Brief Description |
Hearing/Decision |
Date |
|
2001-0478 |
Special Development Permit 2nd story addition and a Negative Declaration noting that the site and its structures are not Historically Significant |
Admin. Hearing/Approved |
09/12/01 |
|
1986-0113 |
Tentative Map -Create 3 lots (Approval expired). |
Admin. Hearing/Approved |
01/28/86 |
|
1986-0114 |
Special Development Permit Remove portion of shed, create 2 lots, and construct 2 units (Approval expired). |
Admin. Hearing/Approved |
01/13/86 |
|
1976-0233 |
Special Development Permit -Delete SDP Condition of Approval prohibiting residential use of shed. |
Admin. Hearing/Denied |
01/12/76 |
|
1975-0142 |
Special Development Permit -Create 2 lots w/ lot width waiver (Approval expired). |
Admin. Hearing/Approved |
10/07/75 |
In addition to these applications, the applicants have also submitted two prior Preliminary Reviews for the redevelopment of the site. The first application in August of 2001 proposed remodeling the existing house into a duplex and construction of a separate rear dwelling for a total of three units. The second application in February of 2002 proposed creating a 4-unit condominium project.
Description of Proposed Project
The applicants are requesting approval of a Parcel Map to subdivide an 11,000 square foot lot into 4 lots (i.e. 3 lots and a common lot) and a Special Development Permit (SDP) to allow demolition of a 3,010 sq. ft. accessory utility building, construction of two attached dwelling units, construction of a single family house remodel and addition, and associated site improvements such as landscaping upgrades, underground utilities, shared driveways and parking. The single family house was previously designated as part of a Heritage Streetscape whish has since been redeveloped. A subsequent analysis by a State-licensed architectural/historic consultant and a previously prepared Negative Declaration indicated that the project site and its structures do not meet the State standards for historical significance.
Environmental Review
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this current project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. An initial study has determined that the proposed project would not create any significant environmental impacts (see Attachment 3, Initial Study).
Special Development Permit
Use: The project site is Zoned R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential, Planned Development). A Special Development Permit is required in conjunction with development of all sites that have a Planned Development Combining District. This permit addresses the use, building architecture and site layout as well as specific deviations requested in the project.
The density of the proposed project is 12 units/acre, which does not satisfy the housing goal of achieving at least 75 percent of the maximum allowable density (18 d.u./ac). The 11,000 sq. ft. lot would allow up to 6 dwelling units on the property. Compliance with this policy would require at least 4 dwelling units to be constructed. The applicants have attempted various site plan layouts and have not been able to find a design that maintains their goal of providing ownership units and also satisfying all of the Citys requirements. The property owner is currently proposing 3 dwelling units. At the direction of staff, the applicants also explored the possibility of sharing access with the adjacent properties to allow more efficient circulation and the construction of an additional dwelling unit. The owners of the adjacent recently redeveloped properties were unwilling to grant shared access.
The Planning Commission may find as part of its review of the project that the applicants proposed density is acceptable given the limited redevelopment potential for the project site. It is surrounded by properties that redeveloped to higher densities in the past, the limited site access (only one driveway onto Crescent Avenue) and the propertys existing substandard lot width may make the density acceptable.
The proposed project consists of retaining and remodeling the existing single-family home and developing two attached dwelling units at the rear of the property. All three dwelling units are proposed as ownership units and will have attached 2-car garages and a basement. An existing accessory utility building (i.e. workshop) at the rear of the site will be demolished. The remodeling of the existing single family house will include the reconstruction of a front porch and a new 2nd-story rear addition. The design of the three units is in keeping with the architecture of the original house and will maintain the two-story residential scale that is found in the area. Both Single Family and Multi-family residential uses are allowable in the R-3 Zone with a Special Development Permit approval. Vehicular access to the site will be provided via a driveway at the westside of the property.
The single family house will have a gross floor area of 2,073 sq. ft. and each of the attached units will have a gross floor area of 1,962 sq. ft. The FAR of the single family lot is 73.5% percent and the FAR of the attached units are each 83.5% because the 3,483 sq. ft. area of the shared common lot is excluded from the FAR of the individual lots. The overall FAR for all structures and the entire property is 54.5%. No FAR is established for the R-3 Zone, but the Citys Small-lot Single Family Guidelines suggest an overall project FAR benchmark of 50%. Given the mixed housing-type nature of this project (which includes the retention of the single family house and construction of two new attached units) the proposed FAR may be acceptable. However, staff is recommending Condition of Approval #11 which requires that the size of the proposed units be reduced sufficiently to ensure a 50% FAR for the overall project.
Site Layout: The applicants are retaining the existing house on the site and will remodel it by incorporating a rear two-story addition and reconstruction of a front porch addition that was removed by a previous owner. Behind the existing house two attached dwelling units will be constructed. A 26-foot wide brick and concrete "auto court" with peripheral landscaping will separate the existing house from the two rear units. Each dwelling unit will have its own individual lot, and the auto court and driveway will be maintained as a separate common lot for shared access and utilities. The project sites existing vegetation will be enhanced in a more organized planting plan and by additional landscaping. The open space provided exceeds the minimum requirements established by the Zoning Code. Both rear units will have rear yard decks and the front house will have a side yard brick patio.
The applicants requested deviations from the Zoning Code are noted in the table below.
|
Deviation |
Specific Change |
Affected Lots |
Comment |
|
Min. Lot Size |
Reduce lot size from 8,000 sf to range of 2,349 -3,483 sf |
1-3, & Common Lot |
Consistent with SDPs approvals in the area that allowed "postage stamp" size lots. |
|
Lot Width |
Reduce from 120 to 19 (Common Lot), 30 (Lots 2 & 3) and 41 (lot 1) |
1-3, & Common Lot |
Consistent with SDPs approvals in the area that allowed "postage stamp" size lots. Existing 60 lot is already non-conforming. |
|
Lot Coverage |
Increase from 40% to range of 47.7-51.9% for individual lots. |
1-3 |
Overall project lot coverage is maintained at 33.7% |
|
Front Setback |
Reduce 15 setback to 13 (Lot 1) and 0 (Lots 2 & 3) |
1-3 |
Consistent with SDPs approvals in the area that allowed "postage stamp" size lots. Also required to reconstruct porch for SF house. |
|
Left Setback |
Reduce 8 setback to 0 for attached unit (Lot 2) |
2 |
Overall project setback to existing side property line is maintained at 8 ft. |
|
Right Setback |
Reduce 8 setback to 0 for attached unit (Lot 3) and 2-8" along for SF house (Lot 1) |
1 & 3 |
Overall project setback to existing side property line is maintained at 8 ft. |
|
Rear Setback |
Reduce 10 setback to 0. |
1 |
Overall project setback to existing rear property line is maintained at 16-10". |
The proposed site layout with its reduced setbacks, reduced lot widths, increase lot coverage and smaller lots is similar to other developments that have been approved along Crescent Avenue. Staff has worked with the applicant to reduce the apparent bulk and mass of the proposed structures, reduce potential privacy impacts, and provide a design more in keeping with the neighborhoods scale and character. With the exception of the front setback, the projects setbacks to the existing property lines will comply with minimum Zoning Code requirements.
The following Guidelines were considered in analysis of the project site design.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Site Layout) |
Comments |
|
A1. New projects shall be compatible with the surrounding development in intensity, setbacks, building forms, material, color and landscaping. |
The architectural design and scale of the proposed project is compatible with residential character of the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent development. |
Architecture:
The applicants are proposing an Arts & Crafts-style design for the proposed units that is compatible with the original architecture of the existing house and the scale of the surrounding residential neighborhood. All three buildings will have gabled roof forms, exposed rafter/eave details, horizontal wood siding, and double-hung wood trimmed windows consistent with this style. The project will also reconstruct a porch for the Single Family house that was removed by a previous owner.
The following Guidelines were considered in the analysis of the project architecture.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Architecture) |
Comments |
|
C1. Maintain diversity and individuality in style but be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. |
The proposed project will be constructed of a design, materials, and at a residential scale that is compatible with the rest of the neighborhood and adjacent development. |
|
C9. Include decorative building elements in the design of all buildings. Add more interest to buildings by incorporating changes in wall plane and height, etc. |
The Arts & Crafts style architecture of the proposed buildings has a number of design elements that create a high-quality product, including decorative trellis elements, double-hung wood-trimmed windows, covered porches with exposed rafter details, and gabled roof elements. |
Landscaping:
As noted, the applicants will be upgrading the landscaping and look of the project site. The project will exceed landscaping standards by providing over 883 sq. ft. of landscaped area average per unit on-site where 425 sq. ft. average per unit is required by the Zoning Code. This landscaping will consist of trees, shrubs, and ground cover, and will be distributed throughout the site within proposed private yards, parking area landscaping, building foundation planting, front yard planting, and along the project sites periphery with adjacent properties. Staff has included Condition of Approval #10 requiring that prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant provide the Planning Division a Final Detailed Landscaping Plan that is consistent with the landscaping improvements noted on the Site Plan.
The following Guidelines were considered in analysis of the project landscaping.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Landscape) |
Comments |
|
Guiding Policy: Landscaping shall be used to enhance sites and buildings, control climate and noise, create transition between adjacent uses, unify various site components, and define and separate functions and activities. |
With the proposed additional landscaping enhancements, the project will comply with this policy. |
Parking/Circulation:
As noted earlier, access to the property is limited to a driveway on Crescent Avenue. The project complies with the Zoning Codes minimum required parking standards by providing 6 garage spaces (i.e. 3 attached two-car garages) and two surface parking spaces. Each unit will have direct access from the living area of the individual unit into its attached garage. Staff has included Condition of Approval #15 requiring that the two surface spaces shall be maintained as visitor spaces and shall be properly designated with signs or parking stall stenciling.
Pedestrian access from the street to the rear units will be provided by the shared auto court and driveway. The concrete auto court and driveway have brick paving border accents which delineate informal pedestrian walkways and help slow down traffic because of the change in the driving surface.
The following Guidelines were considered in analysis of the project parking and circulation.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Parking/Circulation) |
Comments |
|
Guiding Policy: Project site shall be conveniently accessible to both pedestrians and automobiles. Sufficient off-street parking shall be provided for every project. On-site circulation patterns shall be designed to adequately accommodate traffic. Potential negative impacts of parking areas on adjacent uses shall be minimized and mitigated. |
Adequate parking and on-site vehicle and pedestrian circulation have been provided for the proposed uses and the project complies with the Zoning Code parking requirements. |
Easements/Undergrounding:
The project will be required to underground all utilities. The majority of these utilities will be located underneath the auto court and driveway which will serve as a common lot with a shared public utility easement.Tentative Map
General: The proposed project requires the subdivision of the existing 11,000 square foot property into four lots (i.e. 3 parcels and a common lot). The lots will range in size from 2,349 to 3,483 square feet in size.
Access: All three lots will obtain vehicular access from a single driveway located on the Common Lot (Lot 4). Utilities will also be placed underground in the Common lot via a Public Utilities Easement. Staff is recommending as a Condition of Approval that a maintenance agreement shall be recorded with the Tentative Map.
Compliance with Development Standards
|
Requested Deviations |
Justifications |
|
|
Staff believes that this project provides a higher level of architectural quality, increased average open space and landscaping per unit, a compatible residential use with its surroundings, and additional ownership opportunities that would not be available if the project were required to comply with the standards noted. Staff finds adequate justification to approve the requested deviations.
Compliance with General Plan:
The following goals and policies were considered to determine conformance with the General Plan.
|
General Plan Sub-Element |
Goal or Policy |
Comment |
|
Housing and Community Revitalization |
A.1 Continue to improve, if feasible, the existing jobs to housing ratio |
The projects 2 additional housing units would incrementally improve the Citys jobs/housing ratio. |
|
Housing and Community Revitalization |
A.4.a The City shall require all new developments to build at least 75% of permitted density. |
The site is surrounded by adjacent developments which limit its ability to satisfy this policy, maintain minimum open space and parking requirements, and also provide housing opportunities other than for rental apartments. |
|
Land Use and Trasportation |
C2.2 Encourage the development of ownership housing to maintain a majority of housing in the city for ownership choice |
The project is consistent with this policy as it incrementally improves the Citys ownership/rental housing ratio. |
|
Land Use and Trasportation |
N.1.2.2 Utilize adopted City design guidelines to achieve compatible architecture and scale for renovation and new development in Sunnyvale neighborhoods. |
High-quality architecture and a residential scale that is compatible with the Citywide Design Guidelines and the surrounding neighborhood is provided. |
|
Land Use and Trasportation |
N.1.4.1 Require infill development to complement the character of the residential neighborhood. |
The projects design and scale complement the surrounding residential neighborhood. |
Expected Impact on the Surroundings
The proposed project will lead to an increase in the intensity of use of the site, but no significant traffic or noise impacts are expected as a result of the project. The main impact will be visual, as two 2-story structures will change the look of the site from the street and the surrounding properties. As discussed in the Site Layout and Architecture sections, the applicant has worked with staff to address the projects compatibility to the existing neighborhood and staff finds that the new proposal will not create a significant privacy impact for the adjoining neighbors. Staff also finds the architectural style suitable for the existing house and the surrounding neighborhood.
Findings, General Plan Goals and Conditions of Approval
Staff was
able to make the required Findings based on the justifications for the Special Development Permit and Tentative Map.Fiscal Impact
No fiscal impacts other than normal fees and taxes are expected.
Public Contact
|
Notice of Negative Declaration and Public Hearing |
Staff Report |
Agenda |
|
|
|
Alternatives
Recommendation
Recommend Alternative 1 to the City Council.
Prepared by:
Erwin Ordoņez
Project Planner
Reviewed by:
Fred Bell
Principal Planner
Reviewed by:
Trudi Ryan
Planning Officer
Findings - Special Development Permit
1. The proposed use attains the objectives and purposes of the General Plan of the City of Sunnyvale as the project promotes owner occupied housing in an area with both ownership and rental housing. The neighborhood is a mix of multi-family condominiums, apartments and single family houses and the proposed development will be compatible with the existing pattern of development along Crescent Avenue.
2. The proposed use ensures that the general appearance of proposed structures, or the uses to be made of the property to which the application refers, will not impair either the orderly development of, or the existing uses being made of, adjacent properties as the proposed architecture meets the City-Wide Design Guidelines, will be a benefit to the neighborhood and is compatible with the existing architectural character of the neighborhood.
Findings - Tentative Map
The City Council, Planning Commission, or Director of Community Development shall deny the Tentative Map if it makes any of the following findings:
A. That the subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
C. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed type of development.
D. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
F. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
H. That the map fails to meet or perform one or more requirements or conditions imposed by the "Subdivision Map Act" or by the Municipal Code.
- Staff was able to make the required Findings based on the justifications for the Tentative Map.
Conditions of Approval - Special Development Permit
In addition to complying with all applicable City, County, State and Federal Statutes, Codes, Ordinances, Resolutions, the Permittee expressly accepts and agrees to comply with the following Conditions of Approval for this Permit.
GENERAL
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
The CC&Rs shall include:
BUILDING DESIGN
Landscape and Site Plans
Parking
Conditions of Approval - Tentative Map
A. Planning Division
The Tentative Map shall be valid for a period of two years, measured from the date of approval by the final review authority.
The Tentative Map shall be applicable only in conjunction with a valid Special Development Permit.
B. Building Safety Division
Obtain Grading Permits as required (MCS 16.12.010).
Provide soils report prepared by a licensed soils laboratory (Res. 193-76).
C. Public Works
D. Fire Prevention
Comply with the Sunnyvale Fire Prevention Code (MC 2099-84; Title 19 of Calif. Admin. Code Sec. 1.12(l); UFC 1982 Edition).
The water supply for fire protection and fire fighting systems shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction on the site (MC 16.52.170).
E. Other Public Agencies
1. Pay School Tax fees prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Return to RTC# 02-308