|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |
September 17, 2002
|
SUBJECT: |
2002-0480 - Jeff Kwok [Applicant/Owner]: Applications for a 10,050 square foot site located at 985 Bellomo Avenue in an R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District (APN: 211-16-004); |
|
Introduction of an Ordinance |
Rezone from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District to R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential/Planned Development) Zoning District; |
|
Motion |
Special Development Permit to allow the construction of four town homes; |
|
Motion |
Tentative Map to subdivide one lot into four townhouse lots and one common lot. |
REPORT IN BRIEF
|
Existing Site Conditions |
Duplex |
|
Surrounding Land Uses |
|
North |
Single Family Approved 8-unit townhouse project pending |
South |
Duplex and detached townhomes |
East |
Across Bellomo Ave., townhomes, single family, and vacant lot |
West |
Willow Pond Apartments |
|
Issues |
Front Yard Setback |
|
Environmental Status |
A Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. |
|
PC Recommendation |
Approve with Conditions |
|
Staff Recommendation |
Approve with Conditions |
![]() |
PROJECT DATA TABLE
|
EXISTING |
PROPOSED |
REQUIRED/ PERMITTED |
|
|
General Plan |
Res. Medium Density |
Same |
Res. Medium Density |
|
Zoning District |
R-3 |
R-3/PD |
Council Approval |
|
Lot Size (s.f.) |
Total: 10,050 |
Lots 1 and 4: 1,127 Lots 2 and 3: 967 Common: 5,795 Total: 9,983 (0.23 ac.) |
8,000 min. |
|
Lot Width (ft.) |
67 |
23.58 27.49 |
120 ft. |
|
Gross Floor Area (s.f.) |
N/A |
5,806 |
No max. |
|
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) |
N/A |
58% |
No max. |
|
Lot Coverage (%) |
31.1% |
31.3% |
40% max. |
|
No. of Units |
2 |
4 |
5 max. |
|
Density (units/acre) |
8.7 du/acre |
17.4 du/acre |
24 du/acre max. |
|
Meets 75% min? |
No |
Yes |
Yes by Housing Policy |
|
Bedrooms/Unit |
1 3-bdrm unit 1 2-bdrm unit |
4 3-bdrm units |
No req. |
|
Unit Sizes (s.f.) |
Main house - 1,754 Guest Unit - 915 |
Livable 1,476 Garage 714 Total 2,190 |
N/A |
|
No. of Buildings On-Site |
2 |
1 |
--- |
|
Building Height (ft.) |
15 ft. |
30 ft. |
30 ft. max. |
|
No. of Stories |
1 |
3 |
2 max. |
|
Setbacks (facing prop.) |
|||
|
25 ft. |
15 ft. |
20 ft. min. |
|
24 ft. |
20 ft. |
12 ft. min. |
|
10 ft. |
12 ft. |
9 ft. min. |
|
13 ft. |
15 ft. 5% rear yard encroachment |
10 ft. min. with less than 25% rear yard encroachment |
|
Landscaping (sq. ft.) |
|||
|
1,971 |
2,901 |
1,996 sq. ft. min. |
|
985/unit |
725/unit |
425/unit min. |
|
N/A |
Total: 2,032 508/unit |
400/unit min. |
|
Parking |
|||
|
2 |
10 |
10 min. |
|
2 |
8 |
8 min. |
Starred and shaded items indicate deviations from Sunnyvale Municipal Code standards.
ANALYSIS
Background
On August 26, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed this project. No other citizens gave testimony regarding the proposal, and the Planning Commission had a brief discussion regarding issues such as the front-yard setback and the impact on the single family property owner to the south. The Commission concurred with staff recommendation and approved the project with attached conditions.
Previous Actions on the Site: The following table summarizes previous planning applications related to the subject site.
|
File Number |
Brief Description |
Hearing/Decision |
Date |
|
1984-0618 |
Change General Plan from RHI (High Density Residential) to RMED (Medium Density Residential |
City Council / Approved |
2/28/84 |
|
1981-0194 |
Variance from Side Yard Setbacks and lot coverage |
Administrative Hearing/ Approved |
7/8/81 |
Description of Proposed Project
The proposed project consists of demolition of the existing structures and construction of four townhouse units. The existing driveway will be extended the length of the lot and provide access to both the private garages for each unit and two guest spaces at the back of the project. The north side of the lot will be landscaped and provide private backyard areas for the project. This project is similar to other townhouse projects being built in the immediate area.
Environmental Review
A Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. An initial study has determined that the proposed project would not create any significant environmental impacts (see Attachment 3, Initial Study).
Rezoning
Change under Consideration: The subject property is located within an R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. The applicant is requesting the addition of a PD (Planned Development) Combining District requiring a Rezone to R-3/PD.
Objective: The purpose of the Planned Development Combining District is to provide modifications, additions and limitations to other zoning districts to meet special conditions and situations. In 1998, the City Council approved guidelines for the use of PDs and Special Development Permits (SDPs). The subject request for a PD meets all of the three applicable established guidelines.
The project involves the subdivision of one property into five lots, requiring deviations from the requirements of 8,000 sq. ft. per lot and 120 linear feet in lot width. These deviations will be necessary to create separate owner-occupied lots while providing good site and building design.
Discussion: A property may be Rezoned to include the PD Combining District in absence of a specific project or approval of a specific project. The PD Zoning enables the consideration of deviations from the Code and/or imposition of more restrictive requirements.
The surrounding properties are developed with duplexes, townhomes or single family homes. The PD Combining District provides flexibility in designing a project that is consistent with the emerging character of the immediate neighborhood and in allowing townhouse-style ownership housing. Due to the variety of housing styles and types, staff finds that the proposed zoning is appropriate for the site.
Special Development Permit
Use: The proposed use consists of medium-density attached ownership housing. The density is 17.4 du/acre where 24 du/acre is the maximum. The project provides 4 units where 5 are the maximum, resulting in approximately 80% of the maximum number of units allowed on-site. The Housing and Community Revitalization Sub-element has a policy that "all new residential developments should build at least 75% of the permitted zoning density." (Policy A.2.)
The proposed unit sizes are 2,190 sq. ft. including the garage. The living area is approximately 1,476 sq. ft. with a large 714 sq. ft. garage. The living and garage areas are consistent with previously approved townhome projects at 973-979 Bellomo Avenue, 992 Bellomo Avenue and Rosemary Terrace at the corner of Wolfe Road and Maria Lane.
Site Layout: The proposal includes four attached units facing the side property line. A one-way driveway slopes down from the street and serves all four lots with a shared parking area at the end of the driveway. This driveway and parking area are located on the common lot. Open space areas are located behind the units along the north property line (see Attachment 4, Site Plan).
The proposed building has covered porches at both the front and rear of the lot that serve as private entries into Units 1 and 4. Units 2 and 3, located at the center of the building, are accessed through a center staircase that leads from the driveway to the second floor (first floor of living area). Those units have private entries from that staircase.
Discussion of all proposed deviations is found in the "Compliance with Development Standards" section.
Architecture: The proposed architecture is a contemporary style that includes a variety of architectural details and materials.
|
Materials |
|
|
Decorative Elements |
|
|
Color |
Includes grays, gray-blues, and gray-greens |
Building Height and Number of Stories:
The proposed building height is 30 ft. as measured from the top of curb along Bellomo Avenue. The project is proposing three stories. Two-stories or 30 ft. is the maximum for the R-3 Zoning District.While the materials and colors proposed for this project are substantially different than those in the immediate vicinity, the building mass and exterior decorative elements are similar. Staff finds this design to be appropriately detailed and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff still has some minor concerns with the project architecture and recommends as Condition of Approval #11 that staff continue to work on additional architectural details with the project applicant. Condition of Approval #12 requires final approval of colors and materials by the Director of Community Development.
The following Guidelines were considered in the analysis of the project architecture.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Architecture) |
Comments |
|
C2. In areas where no prevailing architectural style exists, maintain the general neighborhood character by the use of similar scale, forms and materials providing that it enhances the neighborhood. |
The neighborhood is a mixture of different architectural styles. The scale and massing of the project is similar to surrounding townhouse projects and the architectural details will visually benefit the neighborhood. |
|
C9. Include decorative building elements in the design of all buildings. Add more interest to buildings by incorporating changes in wall plane and height, etc. |
The project includes a variety of architectural details such as corbels, varying roof forms, projecting arched gables, arched windows and wall modulations. |
Landscaping:
Residential uses in the R-3 Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 425 sq. ft. of landscaping and 400 sq. ft. of usable open space per unit. The project meets this requirement with private open space in the rear yards of individual units and at the rear of the site along the west property line.Existing Trees: There is one significant pine tree located at the front of the site. The applicant is proposing removal of this tree, as the construction trucks could cause compaction of the soil that would affect the trees health.
Staff supports the request for removal with a replacement requirement. Because the front yard is narrow and Public Works is already requiring installation of a street tree, staff recommends as Condition of Approval #13a that fast-growing screening plants be installed along the south property line to the left of the driveway to provide shade for the driveway and screening for the surrounding lots.
Parking/Circulation: Each unit provides two garage spaces and the project provides two uncovered guest spaces at the end of the driveway. This project meets the required minimum parking standards of eight covered and two uncovered spaces. Staff recommends as Conditions of Approval #17 and #18 that the property owners maintain the garage spaces for the parking of vehicles and that recreational vehicles over 18 ft. in length are prohibited from being stored on-site.
Undergrounding: The project is required to underground both service drops and overhead boundary lines that run along Bellomo Avenue in front of the project site.
Tentative Map
Access: The project proposal includes four individual townhome lots ranging in size from 967 to 1,127 sq. ft. to gain access from one common lot of 5,795 sq. ft. Staff recommends Tentative Map Conditions of Approval #6 requiring the formation of a homeowners association and CC&Rs allowing for the joint use of the drive aisle, two open parking spaces and rear open space.
Dedications: The applicant is required to dedicate a one-foot wide strip of land along Bellomo Avenue as shown on the site plan.
Compliance with Development Standards
|
Requested Deviation |
Justifications |
|
|
After reviewing the project, staff finds that there is adequate justification to support the proposed deviations.
Expected Impact on the Surroundings
There are no significant traffic or noise impacts expected with the project. The main impact will be visual, as a new three-story structure will change the look of the site from the street and the surrounding properties. Staff finds the architectural style suitable for the neighborhood. With the suggested Conditions of Approval, the proposed project will be beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood.
Findings, General Plan Goals and Conditions of Approval
Staff was able to make the required Findings based on the justifications for the Rezone, Special Development Permit and Tentative Map.
Fiscal Impact
No fiscal impacts other than normal fees and taxes are expected.
Public Contact
A Planning Commission hearing was held on this item on August 26, 2002. No one except the applicant spoke regarding the project. Staff has not received any letters or comments.
|
Notice of Negative Declaration and Public Hearing |
Staff Report |
Agenda |
|
|
|
Alternatives
Recommendation
Alternative 1.
|
Prepared by: |
|
Reviewed by:
Robert Paternoster |
|
Approved by: Robert S. LaSala City Manager |
|
|
|
Findings Rezone
Precise Zoning Plans are adopted to promote and protect the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the city. The Rezone from R-3 to R-3/PD is appropriate as it provides flexibility in designing a project that is consistent with the emerging character of the immediate neighborhood and in allowing townhouse-style ownership housing. This Rezone will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood as it is in compliance with General Plan Goals and Policies as well as the City-Wide Design Guidelines.
Findings Special Development Permit
Land Use and Transportation Element
C2.2 Encourage the development of ownership housing to maintain a majority of housing in the City for ownership choice.
N1.4.1 Require infill development to complement the character of the residential neighborhood
The project will provide townhomes for additional homeownership opportunities. The project meets the Housing and Community Revitalization Sub-Element Goal of providing at least 75% of the permitted number of residential units. The proposed project is in keeping with the emerging character of the neighborhood as a series of 4-unit townhouse projects. The building design is similar to other projects along the street and the architectural style, while slightly different than previous projects, and will remain compatible with the other projects along the street.
2. The proposed use ensures that the general appearance of proposed structures, or the uses to be made of the property to which the application refers, will not impair either the orderly development of, or the existing uses being made of, adjacent properties as the site design of the project meets City-Wide Design Guidelines while minimizing paving visible from the street and providing an entry feature on the front unit.
Findings - Tentative Map
The City Council or Planning Commission shall deny the Tentative Map if it makes any of the following findings.
The subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
The site is not physically suitable for the proposed type of development.
The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The design of the subdivision or proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.
The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
The map fails to meet or perform one or more requirements or conditions imposed by the "Subdivision Map Act" or by the Municipal Code.
The subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs of the General Plan. The project, in conjunction with an approved Special Development Permit, meets the overall density allowed in the Zone and supports a land use that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The project also meets the goals and policies of the General Plan, as enumerated above.
Conditions of Approval - Special Development Permit
In addition to complying with all applicable Federal, State and local rules and regulations, including the Sunnyvale Municipal Code the permittee expressly accepts and agrees to comply with the following conditions of approval for this permit.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development.
GENERAL
BUILDING DESIGN
LANDSCAPING AND SITE PLANS
PARKING
Conditions of Approval - Tentative Map
A. PLANNING DIVISION
|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |