City Manager Performance Evaluation Questionnaire
Instructions:
The response to each question provides a linear scale ranging from 1 to 5 between two opposing responses. The lower the number, the closer the respondent agrees with the response on the left. The higher the number, the closer the respondent agrees with the response on the right. A response of "0" indicates that the respondent is declining to answer the question, for whatever reason. Each respondent should choose the number that most closely agrees with the respondent’s own response.Council should add additional comments on a separate sheet. If you are making clarifying comments for the questions below, reference specific question numbers before the clarifying comments.
Budget and Service Delivery
Budget:
|
Not Understandable |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very Understandable |
|
Not within Budget |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Within Budget |
|
Not attempted/achieved |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Attempted/Achieved |
|
Performance not monitored |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Performance monitored |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
Service Delivery:
|
Not to level specified |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
To level specified |
|
Few met/exceeded |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Most met/exceeded |
|
Few LOSs below |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Many LOSs below |
Comments:
Policy and Planning
|
Not Satisfactory |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very Satisfactory |
|
No Improvements |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Most Services Improved |
|
No advanced alerts |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Alerted to all changes |
|
Poor anticipation |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Good anticipation |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not useful |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very useful |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Poor information/advice |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Good information/advice |
|
Poor implementation |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Good implementation |
|
Not timely |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very timely |
|
Not Understandable |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very Understandable |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not adequate |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very adequate |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
Comments:
Management
Leadership:
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
Communication:
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not adequate |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very adequate |
|
Not adequate |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very adequate |
|
Not adequate |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very adequate |
Staff Development:
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
Organizational/Managerial Effectiveness:
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not willing |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very willing |
|
Not decisive |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very decisive |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not open |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very open |
|
Not willing |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very willing |
|
Not effective |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very effective |
|
Not stubborn |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Very stubborn |
Comments:
Professional and Career Development
|
Not attained targets |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Attained targets |
|
Not accomplished activities |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Accomplished activities |
Comments:
Guiding Principles
PUBLIC SERVICE:
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
RESPECT AND RECOGNITION:
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
LEADERSHIP:
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
HONESTY AND INTEGRITY:
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
|
Strongly Disagree |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Strongly Agree |
Comments:
Return to RTC# 02-381