Report 02-392 Attachment 12
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
City Hall - West Conference Room
Sunnyvale City Hall|
PRESENT: |
Chair Nelson; Comms. Iannotti, Joshi, Lee, Richards, Rowan, Silveira and Sassano |
|
|
EXCUSED ABSENCE : |
Comms. Kitson |
|
STAFF : |
Trudi Ryan, Planning Officer, Fred Bell, Principal Planner, Christine Cannizzo, Project Planner and Annabelle Alderette, Recording Secretary |
|
PRESENT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC : |
Chrisand Giles, Executive Director of Homebuilders Association and Dee Tocher, owner of an industrial building |
CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order by Chair Nelson at 7:00 p.m.
|
Item continued to 10/23/02 |
Ms. Cannizzo presented the following overview regarding staff’s revised recommendations from the staff report:
Ms. Ryan noted that the Planning Commission had reviewed the RTC and made different recommendations on three of the items.
Ms. Cannizzo presented the following on the three items that the Planning Commission recommended:
Chair Nelson asked if any commissioners had questions or comments.
Comm. Richards voiced that the median income is too high and the program should assist families with lesser median income, that are in greater need of affordable housing. Voiced to recommend the increase of the required Below Market Rate units to a minimum of 10 units, expressed that increasing to 12.5% is too high and would impact developers.
Ms. Ryan noted that the median income limits being proposed are broader income ranges and therefore, would assist with providing more families in need of affordable housing.
Comm. Iannotti asked staff if they knew why Planning Commission recommended 12.5% for the required percentage of BMR units instead of staff’s recommended 15%.
Ms. Ryan responded that the Planning Commission felt 12.5% was a reasonable percentage.
Comm. Lee asked Chair Nelson if she had any additional comments to add for the commissioners to think about when making their recommendations.
Chair Nelson responded by stating the following:
Comm. Joshi asked staff how do you determine the percentage of required units using the half percent (referred to the 12.5% being recommended by Planning Commission).
Ms. Ryan responded that the number of units are rounded. Her example included a 10% BMR requirement for a 35 unit complex being built would equal 4 affordable housing units and if a 34 unit complex was being built would equal 3 affordable housing units.
Chair Nelson opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m.
Ms. Giles presented the following:
Comm. Joshi asked what percentage are other cities using.
Ms. Giles responded 80% of median income.
Ms. Ryan noted that staff’s report includes modifying the purchase price.
Dee Tocher, owner of an industrial building located on Tasman and North Fairoaks. Ms. Tocher voiced that the BMR program is a great program and would like to participate in it. The high demand for affordable housing units is critical but, if the proposed changes are approved the impact on developers would be severe.
Chair Nelson closed the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m.
First Motion:
|
Comm. Iannotti made a motion to approve revision of the BMR Housing Program and adopt the changes in the Affordable Housing Ordinance for Alternative 2a (Increase the required percentage of BMR units to 15%) of the RTC 2002-0071 – City of Sunnyvale Study Issue Review the Below Market Rate Housing Program, and Chair Nelson seconded. Comm. Richards opposed and Comm. Sassano abstained. Motion carried 6-1-1. |
Second Motion:
|
Comm. Richards made a motion to approve increasing the required Below Market Rate units to a minimum of 10 units. Motion died due to lack of second. |
Third Motion:
|
Comm. Nelson made a motion to approve revision of the BMR Housing Program and adopt the changes in the Affordable Housing Ordinance of Alternative 2b (Lower the exempt units to 6 or fewer) of the RTC 2002-0071 – City of Sunnyvale Study Issue Review the Below Market Rate Housing Program, and Comm. Iannotti seconded. Comm. Richards opposed. Motion carried 7-1. |
Fourth Motion:
|
Comm. Lee made a motion to adopt all of staff’s recommendations for Alternative 1a – 1b and Alternative 2a – 2i (the introduction of an ordinance) of the RTC 2002-0071 – City of Sunnyvale Study Issue Review the Below Market Rate Housing Program, and Comm. Silveira seconded. Motion carried 8-0. |
Chair Nelson voiced that staff’s changes were the addition of the narrative portion of the CAPER; HHSC had received the 1st draft at the August meeting.
Comm. Rowan voiced that the report was comprehensive and wanted to let staff know that they did a good job on it.
First Motion:
|
Comm. Rowan made a motion to approve the Draft Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report for Program Year 2001-2002, Comm. Silveira seconded. Motion carried 8-0. |
|
MEETING DATE |
AGENDA ITEM/ISSUE |
|
January 23, 2002 |
|
|
February 27, 2002 |
|
|
March 27, 2002 |
|
|
April 24, 2002 |
|
|
May 22, 2002 |
|
|
June 26,2002 |
|
|
July 24, 2002 |
|
|
August 28, 2002 |
|
|
September 5, 2002 |
|
|
September 25, 2002 |
|
|
October 23, 2002 |
|
|
November 20,2002 |
|
|
December 18, 2002 |
No Items.
No Items.
Comm. Joshi reported the following from the September 17, 2002 City Council meeting:
Voiced that there were no other items relating to HHSC.
Chair Nelson reported the following from the September 24, 2002 City Council meeting:
Ms. Ryan noted the following on the submitted applications,
at the 9/24/02 Council meeting, regarding the 4-acre site located at 1002 W. Washington Avenue (Mary Manor Shopping Center):Chair Nelson indicated she spoke to the City Council on this item, expressing concern that the R-1.7 zoning with large units, would establish a bad precedent.
Comm. Lee presented the following overview regarding the actions and strategies the City will pursue and will be included in its 2002 Analysis of Impediments
Research and measure the extent of housing discrimination in Sunnyvale
Coordinate with other organizations to address fair housing issues
Review and monitor the City’s contracts for fair housing activities
Comm. Lee voiced that Chair Nelson is a good leader and thanked her for her leadership on the HHSC.
Ms. Alderette indicated that First United Methodist Church was requesting additional funds in the amount of $3,000 for the use of providing transportation to and from the Senior Nutrition Program site. Voiced that because there were disencumbered funds from FY02-03, staff is proposing to reallocate the funding to meet the additional request. Voiced that this would also allow us to meet performance goals set by HUD because we would be spending CDBG funds in a timely manner; therefore, staff is granting the amount of $4,000. Staff will be working on the Report to Council to recommend that the additional funding be approved.
First Motion:
|
Comm. Joshi made a motion to approve the requested funding from First United Methodist Church (Sr. Nutrition Program), for the use of providing transportation to and from the program site, Comm. Iannotti seconded. Motion carried 8-0. |
Chair Nelson adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Return to RTC# 02-392