|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |
March 18, 2003
|
SUBJECT: |
Proposed Criteria for Evaluating Recommended Revisions to the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan |
|
REPORT IN BRIEF |
|
This report describes proposed criteria that the City Council could use in considering recommended revisions to the 10-Year Capital Projects Plan. The City Manager used four criteria in making recommended revisions to the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan. Council may use these criteria as presented, or revise them, in providing preliminary policy direction at a special City Council meeting on March 20, 2003 when it re-considers the City Manager's recommended revisions to the 10-Year Plan. |
|
BACKGROUND |
|
The City Manager presented a 6-Point Plan of Action in response to the City's fiscal and budget crisis to the City Council at the annual future fiscal issues workshop on January 28, 2003. The report described the nature and scope of the financial problems that the City is facing, outlined six budget strategies to address these problems, and presented an approach for providing public input and a time frame for implementation. One budget strategy called for City staff to re-examine the 10-Year Capital Projects Plan, and to make recommended revisions to help close the projected $11 million annual gap between revenues and expenses in the General Fund. The City Manager presented the recommended revisions to the 10-Year Plan at a special City Council meeting on February 26, 2003. City Council directed staff to prepare and distribute a worksheet and summary report for each project currently included in the 10-Year Plan. Council members Jack Walker and Fred Fowler worked with the City Manager in developing a process for Council to review this information and to provide preliminary policy direction on next fiscal year's 10-Year Plan. |
|
EXISTING POLICY |
|
The Fiscal Management Sub-Element to the City General Plan contains several goals, policies, and action statements that address the City's annual budget and resource allocation plan. These can provide guidance for the City Council as it considers the proposed revisions to the 10-Year Plan. Goal 7.1B. Financial Practices: Maintain sound financial practices, which meet all applicable standards and direct the City's financial resources toward meeting the City's long-term goals. Policy 7.1B.1 Resource Allocation: Allocate resources in direct relation to general plan goals.
Policy 7.1B.2 Capital Improvements, Maintenance and Replacement: Provide for optimal maintenance of capital improvement and schedule equipment for future replacement at the most cost-effective time.
Policy 7.1B.5 Performance Budget System: Maintain and refine the Performance Budget System to assure its use for multi-year planning, full cost accounting and budget monitoring.
Policy 7.1B.6 Capital Improvements Funding: Use all available funding sources to finance capital improvement projects consistent with City priorities.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|
City staff provided Council with an information package on recommended revisions to the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Plan on March 5, 2003. This information package contained
In addition, the City Council expressed interest in reviewing the criteria that the City Manager used in making his recommended revisions to the FY 2002/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan. (See attached report from Council Members Walker and Fowler.) It is anticipated that the City Council could use these criteria, or a different set of criteria, in providing preliminary policy direction on the recommended revisions to the 10-Year Plan. Following a public hearing when members of the public could provide ideas, suggestions, and opinions on the possible criteria, the criteria could be formally adopted by Council. A special meeting has been scheduled for March 20, 2003 to allow Council to consider the recommended revisions to the 10-Year Plan, and to provide preliminary policy direction. The City Manager used four criteria in recommending whether existing projects should be either retained at current funding levels, retained at changed funding levels, or deleted from the current 10-Year Plan. These same criteria were used in recommending new projects to the plan. The criteria are:
These criteria are described in more detail in the "Recommended Revisions to the 10-Year Capital Plan" report. The City Manager used one or more of these criteria in making recommendations regarding specific capital projects. It is requested that the City Council provide preliminary policy direction at the March 20, 2003 special meeting on the recommended revisions to the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan. By providing policy direction, City staff will be able to incorporate Council direction into the City Manager's recommended FY 2003/2004 budget and resource allocation plan. City staff can also use this preliminary policy direction to determine how much of the $11 million gap between expenses and revenues in the General Fund can be closed by revisions to the 10-Year Plan. The City Council will not be adopting the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan on March 20th. This action will be taken in June when Council considers and adopts the FY 2003/2004 budget. |
|
FISCAL IMPACT |
|
This report addresses criteria that will be used in evaluating recommended changes to the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan. As such, there is no direct fiscal impact of establishing a list of criteria. Of course, there will be a significant fiscal impact when Council approves the 10-Year Plan for next fiscal year. There may be a fiscal impact if Council were to direct the City Manager to use new criteria to re-evaluate the recommended 10-Year Plan. This fiscal impact could increase if there are significantly more criteria than the City Manager used in making his recommendation regarding the FY 2003/2004 10-Year Capital Projects Plan. Staff can not determine the size of the fiscal impact until Council establishes the criteria, and determines how the criteria should be used. |
|
PUBLIC CONTACT |
|
Public contact was made through posting of the Council agenda on the City's official notice bulletin board, posting of the agenda and report on the City's web page, publication of the Council agenda in the San Jose Mercury News, and the availability of the report in the Library and the City Clerk's Office. |
|
ALTERNATIVES |
|
Four alternatives are available. They are: |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION |
|
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Alternative 1. |
|
Prepared by: |
|
Approved by: |
|
Attachments |
|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |