|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |
April 1, 2003
|
SUBJECT: |
Proposed Criteria for Evaluating Recommended Reductions to City Services and Levels of Service |
|
REPORT IN BRIEF |
|
This report describes proposed criteria that the City Council could use in considering recommended reductions to City services and levels of service. I am using this "set of principles" in preparing my recommended reductions to services and levels of service. This report will be distributed to the City Council on April 18, and considered by Council May 2, 2003. The recommended reduction to services and levels of service is being made to respond to the City's financial and budget crisis. |
|
BACKGROUND |
|
I presented a 6-Point Plan of Action in response to the City's fiscal and budget crisis to the City Council at the annual future fiscal issues workshop on January 28, 2003. The report described the nature and scope of the financial problems that the City is facing, outlined six budget strategies to address these problems, and presented an approach for providing public input and a time frame for implementation. The $11 million gap in the General Fund represents a structural imbalance between expenses and revenues. To address this imbalance, the 6-Point Action Plan called for the reduction in the size of city government in Sunnyvale, and the reshaping of City staff to a level that is sustainable for the foreseeable future. Point 6 is a budget strategy entitled "Reductions to Services, Levels of Service, and Staffing". This budget strategy calls for a fundamental re-examination and reduction of the services provided by the City, a fundamental re-setting of levels of service for the remaining City services, and a phased reduction of the size of the City's workforce in order to establish realistic staffing levels. Sunnyvale's planning and financial systems have created both sufficient cash reserves and time so that this fundamental reduction of services and staff can be phased during a three-year period. |
|
EXISTING POLICY |
|
The Fiscal Management Sub-Element to the City General Plan contains several goals, policies, and action statements that address the City's annual budget and resource allocation plan. These can provide guidance for the City Council when it considers recommended reductions to services and levels of service. Goal 7.1B. Financial Practices: Maintain sound financial practices, which meet all applicable standards and direct the City's financial resources toward meeting the City's long-term goals. Policy 7.1B.1 Resource Allocation: Allocate resources in direct relation to general plan goals. Action Statement 7.1B.1c When considering new or expanded services, implement those necessary to support the goals, policies, and action statements of various General Plan elements and sub-elements. Action Statement 7.1B.1d Involve citizens in the budget process to the extent feasible. Policy 7.1B.5 Performance Budget System: Maintain and refine the Performance Budget System to assure its use for multi-year planning, full cost accounting and budget monitoring. Action Statement 7.1B.5d assure that all costs attributable to a budgeted program are fully costed and reflected in program budgets. Action Statement 7.1B.5e Control the growth of City expenditures consistent with meeting public service needs and the requirements of Articles XIII A and B of the California Constitution which limit the growth of revenues and expenditures in accord with prevailing economic conditions. |
|
DISCUSSION |
|
I am providing this report in response to the City Council's request for a set of criteria that I am using in developing my recommendation regarding reductions to services and levels of service. As you will see, this report describes a set of principles that I kept in mind as I reviewed and considered the reduction packages presented for each department. The process of reducing the size of local government for an organization that spends $90+ million annually to serve more than 130,000 customers with a complex array of public programs requires more than a simple set of criteria. I hope what I am outlining for you illustrates how the difficult task of recommending reductions to services and levels of service was completed. Three components made up this set of principles.
The balance of this report describes these three components in more detail. GROUNDING BELIEFS Municipal Compliance with Legal Mandates. Examples of these requirements include federal and state mandates and charter requirements. These include compliance with codes established by federal agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state agencies such as the California Department of Transportation, the California Department of Justice, and the payment of municipal debt service. GUIDING CITY POLICIES I then directed my attention to several other sources of policy priority: the general plan, the existing outcome budget, and the quality of life indices. Each of these documents provides guidance on policies and priorities established by the City Council for the community. KEY QUESTIONS THAT SHAPE SERVICE DELIVERY I then asked a series of questions to develop further information on preferred levels of service to justify service level reductions. These questions are grouped as follows: Public Safety
Environmental Management
Cultural Services Are heritage programs and projects in support of community participation and education? Are we prepared to continue to focus on recruiting and retaining the best employees? Is health and social services funding adequate to leverage other funding sources in the community? When evaluating nearly $90 million dollars of services and nearly 80 outcome-based programs, many other criteria or standards could be developed to determine which level of services should be recommended for retention or elimination. This set of benchmarks was selected to help establish a baseline of services against which reductions could be judged. As stated earlier, I will be discussing the recommended reductions to services and levels of service to Council on May 2, 2003. The City Council indicated its interest in reviewing the criteria that I will be using in developing this recommendation. (See attached report from Council Members Walker and Fowler.) It is anticipated that the City Council could use these criteria, or a different set of criteria, in providing preliminary policy direction on the recommended reductions to services and levels of service on May 2nd. |
|
FISCAL IMPACT |
|
This report addresses the criteria that I am using in preparing recommended reductions to services and levels of service. As such, there is no direct fiscal impact of establishing a list of criteria. Of course, there will be a significant fiscal impact when Council takes final action on the recommendation to reduce services and levels of service. |
|
PUBLIC CONTACT |
|
Public contact was made through posting of the Council agenda on the City's official notice bulletin board, posting of the agenda and report on the City's web page, publication of the Council agenda in the San Jose Mercury News, and the availability of the report in the Library and the City Clerk's Office. |
|
ALTERNATIVES |
|
Three alternatives are available. They are: |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION |
|
I am recommending that Council adopt the first alternative. |
|
Prepared by:
|
|
|
|
Attachments |
Return to RTC# 03-140
|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |