|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |
May 13, 2003
| SUBJECT: | Review of the Fire Rating for Roof Material |
REPORT IN BRIEF
This Study Issue originated when a
citizen expressed concern at the City Council meeting on
Roof material can have a fire rating of Class A, B, C or be non-rated. The minimum current requirement under State law for roof material is Class C.
As part of the research for this
study issue, staff has reviewed standardized test findings to explain what the
different fire ratings actually mean, provided costs estimates, and researched
the requirements in other local jurisdictions. Based on these findings, staff is
recommending that an ordinance be adopted to require a minimum of a Class B fire
rating in the City of
BACKGROUND
This issue was raised at a City
Council public hearing on
At that meeting Mayor Miller and Vice Mayor Risch jointly sponsored this item to be placed as a study issue for consideration for 2003 (Attachment A). At the Council Study Issue Workshop in December 2002, this item was ranked number 2 for the Community Development Department.
EXISTING POLICY
The Uniform
Building Code still allows non-rated roof material for certain types of
buildings, including single family homes. However, since 1995 the State of
Older buildings that still have the original roof material are not required to meet the current code requirements for the fire rating. The current code requires that when 50% or more of the roof material is replaced, the entire roof material must meet the current standards for fire rating.
DISCUSSION
There are four
fire rating categories that roof material can be assigned: Class A, Class B,
Class C, or non-rated. The Class A, B, and C have all been tested and proven
to provide various degrees of fire safety. The non-rated classification has
been tested and determined to provide no protection against fire exposure. As
mentioned above, the current requirement in
The fire rating assigned is based on the entire roof assembly including the material as well as the underlayment. Roofing material alone has a fire rating and, depending on the underlayment materials, the fire rating of the entire assembly could be increased. For example, in lieu of plywood, certain manufactured material can be used (which is designed to provide increased fire resistance) as the underlayment material.
Class A Rating
This is the highest fire rating for roof material. Class A roofing material has been proven to be effective against severe fire test exposures. Based on the test findings, the Class A rated assembly is not readily flammable, affords a fairly high degree of fire protection, and is not expected to produce flying embers. Overall, the Class A material provides over seven times the protection of Class C material.
Class
B Rating
This rating has been proven to be effective against moderate fire test exposures. The Class B rated assembly is not readily flammable, affords a moderate degree of fire protection, and is not expected to produce flying embers. Overall, the Class B material provides almost 4.5 times the protection of Class C material.
Class
C Rating
This rating has been proven to be effective against moderate fire test exposures. The Class C rated assembly is not readily flammable, affords a measurable degree of fire protection, and is not expected to produce flying embers.
Non-Rated
Material
Non-rated
roof coverings provide no protection against fire exposure. The most common
type of material in this category is non-treated wood shake. As of 1995,
non-rated roof material is not allowed on any type of structure in the State
of
|
Price Per |
% Difference from Class C |
|
|
Class C |
$421 |
-- |
|
Class B |
$448 |
6.4% |
|
Class A |
$510 |
21.1% |
The roofing contractors also believe that, due to the chemical treatment, Class A and B rated wood shake roofs do not last as long as the Class C shakes. Class C rated shake roof generally lasts approximately 25 years. Class A or B rated shakes would need to be replaced after about 20 years.
Requirements of Other
Local Jurisdictions
Several other local jurisdictions have adopted ordinances
to require a higher fire rating than Class C. The majority of jurisdictions
that have adopted higher standards are those that are located in high fire
hazard areas such as heavily wooded and hillside communities. Additionally,
the Santa Clara County Planning Office has developed a map of the county that
shows areas of high and low fire hazards. According to this map,
Staff notified the community of this study through several methods as outlined in the Public Contact section of this report. Staff received a few comments from the community. The comments received from the roofing contractors supported the existing Class C fire rating as being adequate. Staff also received two comments from residents who were in support of increasing the fire rating.
The main concern that initiated this study was the risk
of fire spreading through flying embers landing on the roofs of other
buildings. Requiring a higher rated roof material would decrease this
potential. Increasing the minimum fire rating would mainly affect wood shake
roof material as other common materials are already rated at Class A or B.
Additionally, wood shake represents a small portion of re-roofs. Only about
5% of all re-roof permits are for wood shake. If a higher fire rating were
adopted, property owners would still have the option to install wood shake;
however, the costs would be increased (approximately 6%).
The recommended ordinance also requires compliance with the current requirements for the entire roof when over 50% of an existing roof material is replaced.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact to the City is expected. Additional costs may be incurred by property owners when re-roofing a structure depending on the roof material chosen.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Staff notified the community of this study issue in the following ways:
Mailed letters to all neighborhood association presidents
Notification was placed on the Building Division web site
Placed an advertisement on KSUN
Advertisement was published in the winter issue of the Quarterly Report
Display advertisement was published in the April 30 and May 7 issues of The Sun
A legal advertisement was published in The Sun on April 30
The
agenda of this meeting and the staff report were posted at the Library and on
the City of
ALTERNATIVES
Introduce the ordinance to the Municipal Code
(Attachment C) to require a minimum of Class B roof material for all
structures in
Introduce the ordinance to the Municipal Code with modifications.
Do not modify the Municipal Code and retain the requirements of the Class C roof material.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
Prepared
by:
Frank Rainone
Plan Check Coordinator
Diana Perkins
Plan Checker I
Reviewed
by:
Ali Fatapour
Chief Building Official
Randy Edwards
Fire Marshal
Robert Paternoster
Director, Community Development
Approved by:
Robert S. LaSala
City Manager
Attachments
|
Previous Council Item |
Next Council Item | Corresponding Agenda |
| List of Council Meetings | List of Reports to Council | Sunnyvale Home Page |