Previous Council Item

Next Council Item Corresponding Agenda
List of Council Meetings List of Reports to Council Sunnyvale Home Page

 

RTC#03-219

June 17, 2003

SUBJECT:

Adoption of the FY2003/2004 Budget, Master Fee Schedule and Appropriations Limitation (RTC#03-219)

REPORT IN BRIEF

This report outlines the required actions for adoption of the FY 2003/2004 Budget. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the FY 2003/2004 Budget and related matters as contained in this report.

BACKGROUND

On May 20, 2003, City Council held a Budget Workshop to review in detail the Recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget and the Ten-Year Resource Allocation Plan. On June 3, 2003, City Council held a Public Hearing on the Recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget, Establishment of Appropriations Limitation, and Proposed Fee Schedule. At this hearing, members of the public offered comments regarding the recommended budget. Notice of the Public Hearing was sent to those persons specifically requesting notice pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code on fee increases.

EXISTING POLICY

Section 1304 of the City Charter requires the City Council to adopt the budget for the upcoming fiscal year on or before June 30. State legislation requires that the City annually adopt an appropriations limitation for the coming year.

DISCUSSION

Three actions by the City Council are required at the meeting of June 17, 2003. The sequence of actions is set forth in the recommendation section of this report. First, the City Council must consider and take action on proposed fee changes. It is recommended that the Council adopt the fees as presented at the June 3rd Public Hearing. The Fees, Rates and Charges Resolution is provided as Attachment A.

Second, the City Council must adopt the FY 2003/2004 Budget by June 30. This has traditionally been done by resolution. It is recommended that Council adopt the budget as presented at the June 3rd public hearing, along with amendments as prescribed by Council at the public hearing. These amendments are discussed in detail in the Summary of Recommended Budget section below and incorporated as part of Alternative 1. The Budget Resolution, as well as exhibits depicting the appropriations by fund, fund transfers and reserve increases and decreases necessary for implementation of the budget as recommended in this report, is presented as Attachment B.

A separate action on each item is not necessary, unless the City Council wishes to change any recommendation. It is recommended that the budget be approved as described in Alternative 1, with Council’s desired changes being dealt with as amendments to Alternative 1.

Third, the City Council must adopt, by resolution, the FY 2003/2004 Appropriations Limitation. The calculations and the detailed supporting information are contained in Attachment C. A discussion concerning each of the three actions required by Council is described below.

Fees and Charges

The Public Hearing on the proposed fee changes was held as part of the Public Hearing for the Recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget on June 3, 2003. As part of the City Manager’s 6-Point Action Plan to address the budget crisis, staff conducted a comprehensive review of the City’s Fee Schedule to ensure all fees and charges were aligned with the cost of service. The results of staff’s analysis indicated a growing disparity between revenue collection and cost of service. The single largest factor associated with the disparate nature of fee revenue to cost of service was higher than anticipated salary costs.

To address this growing disparity, fees that were not labor based were inflated by a standard percentage of 3% except for those fees that are legally limited. Fees that were labor based were increased by approximately 9%. This increase is in direct correlation with the average salary adjustments approved by Council through the adoption of the FY 2002/2003 Salary Resolution. Staff has also factored in administrative overhead costs to certain fees that were previously not included in the fee structure.

As part of the 6-Point Action Plan, staff reviewed city services for potential cost recovery. As a result of this review, staff has proposed new fees for services that were previously not recovered and therefore subsidized by the City. These new fees were incorporated into the Recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget as part of the proposed Fee Schedule. For ease of reference, a copy of the recommended Fee Schedule for FY 2003/2004 is included as an attachment to this report in Exhibit A of Attachment A. 

On June 10, 2003, Council approved a contract to enter into a short-term agreement with the Humane Society Silicon Valley for animal shelter services. The fees associated with this agreement were itemized as an attachment to the staff’s report. These fees have been added to the FY 2003/2004 Fee Schedule as shown in Exhibit A of Attachment A.

Operating and Project Budgets

Staff recommends adoption of the Operating and Project budgets as presented in the recommended Alternative 1. A Ten-Year Resource Allocation Plan, as well as long-range projections for an additional ten years, was provided earlier to Council as part of the budget document. Since FY 1993/1994, Council has approved a financial plan that has been balanced to the twentieth year. The Fiscal Sub-Element of the General Plan requires under action statement 7.1B.5i that the City Manager "Present a balanced Ten-Year Resource Allocation Plan to the City Council annually . . ." Although budgets are required by the Charter only on an annual basis, the Fiscal Sub-Element requires a multi-year plan.

Appropriations Limitation

Article XIIIB of the California Constitution established an appropriations limitation on government agencies within California. Attachment C provides information on the appropriations limitation, which is a calculation of how much the City is allowed to spend. Calculations for FY 2003/2004 indicate that the City will be below the appropriations limitation by approximately $36 million based on the Recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget. State legislation requires that the City annually adopt an appropriations limitation for the coming year. Also, Council must select one factor from each component below by which to calculate the limit. The options available are as follows:

Inflation Factors

  1. California per capita income
  2. Increase in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction

Population Factors

  1. City population growth
  2. County population growth

Staff recommends that Council select the combination of factors that yields the most favorable amount under the appropriations limitation. Those factors for FY 2003/2004 are the California per capita income and the County population growth. Based on this selection, the appropriations limitation for FY 2003/2004 is calculated to be $119,902,964. Expenditures subject to the appropriation limit exclude Redevelopment Agency activity, Enterprise and internal service activity, debt service payments and capital outlay projects including all infrastructure projects. Revenues related to these projects are also excluded from the calculation. In future years, the factors may be changed by a vote of the City Council.

Although the City is well below the limitation, it is beneficial in the long run to select the growth-rate option that maximizes the amount under the appropriations limitation.

Summary of Recommended Budget

As presented in the recommended budget, the total revenue for FY 2003/2004 is approximately $197 million, and total expenditures are approximately $209 million. The total recommended budget for operating expenditures is approximately $180 million. The total project and equipment budget is approximately $22 million. Debt Service totals approximately $7 million. Details of the revenues and expenditures are contained in the Recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget and Resource Allocation Plan, distributed on May 13, 2003.

Since the distribution of the recommended budget, staff determined that the Public Safety Expanded Recruitment Project was not correctly identified in the above totals. While correctly identified in the financial plan, the total project budget should be increased by $2 million to approximately $9 million and therefore total expenditures are approximately $211 million to accurately account for this project. This revision will be reflected in the adopted budget.

As discussed at the Budget Workshop, the recommended budget does not reflect the potentially significant negative effects of the State Budget. Due to the high level of uncertainty surrounding the State Budget and its impact upon local governments staff was not able to incorporate any of these potential effects during the budget preparation process. Currently, the variance of potential fiscal impacts is still too large to appropriately plan for. When further information becomes available staff will report back to Council with additional recommendations.

Public Hearing

On June 3, 2003, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget. The hearing was formally closed on that date. Upon close of the public hearing, Council provided policy direction on the following items:

The above reductions and revenue increases total $349,725.

Alternative 1, of this report, includes two recommended changes for the FY 2003/2004 Adopted Budget. In addition, Council requested further information on the following items:

In order to restore the 1 Vice/Narcotics Detective staff recommends the following alternative reduction:

As Council adopted utility rates that included this reduction on April 22, 2003, restoring this service to the Wastewater Management Program would require Council to adopt a mid-year rate increase for wastewater service in Sunnyvale. This process would include the setting of a public hearing, appropriate public notification, and then the holding of a public hearing. Staff anticipates that the public hearing could be set for the August 19, 2003 City Council Meeting. If adopted, new Utility Rates would become effective September 1, 2003. Staff estimates that if this service were restored, an additional rate increase of 1.32% for all customer classes would be required. This would take the currently adopted increase of 7% to 8.23%. Under the current adopted rate for FY 2003/2004, the residential wastewater charge would increase from $18.83 per month to $19.06 per month, an additional cost of $0.23 per residential customer per month. This would be an increase of $1.47 per month from the FY 2002/2003 rate. These are preliminary estimates. Should Council choose to move forward, a more detailed financial analysis will be provided as part of the Report to Council for the public hearing.

In addition to the aforementioned items staff would like to alert Council on an issue that may have an impact on the FY 2003/2004 Budget, the contract for janitorial services for City buildings. As Council is aware, service levels associated with janitorial services are to be reduced by approximately 40% as part of the City Manager’s 6-Point Action Plan. At Council’s direction staff recently completed a request for proposal for contracting janitorial maintenance of city buildings. Staff requested that bidders submit two proposals, one that maintains current service levels and one that reflects a 40% reduction in service levels. While the bids associated with current service levels were consistent with the FY 2002/2003 budget of $348,000; the bids associated with the 40% reduction did not reflect a corresponding 40% reduction in cost. Bids submitted at the reduced service level were only 15% less than those received for maintaining current service levels. This has produced a potential funding gap of $91,000 as staff had anticipated lower costs for the reduced services. Staff is currently re-evaluating the service levels and contract proposals as well as the Facility Management’s operations for additional savings. Staff will be presenting a report to Council regarding this matter in July 2003.

Changes to Budget Appropriation and Control Policy

On June 03, 2003, staff presented a report to Council regarding potential alternatives for budget appropriation and amendment policies. At the conclusion of this report Council voted in favor of amending the current appropriation control policy. The revised policy places thresholds on reappropriations between programs. These thresholds have been defined as follows:

In addition, Council requested clarification of the appropriation policy for Enterprise Funds. As Enterprise and Internal Service Funds are business type activities that are controlled by available revenue and demand for service, staff recommends that the following language be added to the budget resolution:

These thresholds have been incorporated into the resolution for the adoption of the FY 2003/2004 Budget as detailed in Attachment B.

FISCAL IMPACT

The various fiscal impacts of the budget have been outlined throughout this report and in the materials previously provided to the City Council. Staff recommends that any amendment approved by Council contain a corresponding cut or revenue to ensure there is no impact to the fund balance.

PUBLIC CONTACT

The Public Hearing on the recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget was conducted on June 3, 2003 and was formally closed on that date. Over the past six months numerous Community and Special Council Meetings have been held to allow citizens significant opportunity to provide input for this year’s budget.

City boards and commissions have been provided the budget for their review. Additionally, public contact has been accomplished through publication and posting of the Council agenda. Further, Reports to Council are available in the Library and on the City’s web page. Finally, the entire budget has been posted on the City’s web page.

ALTERNATIVES

  1. Approve the recommended FY 2003/2004 Budget, Fee Schedule and Appropriations Limitation as represented at the June 3rd Public Hearing, with the changes detailed in this report.
  2. Approve Alternative 1, as amended by further Council action.

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Alternative 1 be approved.

 

Prepared by:
Mark Eyrich
Management Analyst - Budget

Reviewed by:
Grace Kim
Finance Manager - Budget

Mary J. Bradley
Director of Finance

 

Approved by:
Robert S. LaSala
City Manager

 

ATTACHMENTS

  1. Resolution - Fees, Rates & Charges for Services
    Exhibit A - Recommended Fee Schedule
  2. Resolution - Budget
    Exhibit A - Appropriations - General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Enterprise Funds
    Exhibit B - Appropriations - Internal Service Funds
    Exhibit C - Transfers to/from all Funds
    Exhibit D - Appropriations to/Deductions from Reserves - all Funds
  3. Resolution - Appropriations Limit
    Exhibit A - Calculations of Appropriations Limit
  4. Additional Budget Information In Response to Council Members Requests

Previous Council Item

Next Council Item Corresponding Agenda
List of Council Meetings List of Reports to Council Sunnyvale Home Page