CITY OF SUNNYVALE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Office of the Director
June 16, 2003
TO: Robert S. LaSala,
City Manager
FROM: Ernie Bakin,
Director
SUBJECT: Staffing
Proposals by Councilmember Fowler
As requested, this information is in
response to Councilmember Fowler’s "Proposals for Budget Action"
memo dated June 12, 2003, to a) Restructure Top Command, and b) Eliminate the
OES Lieutenant.
Itemized below are my thoughts on the
impact of eliminating an Assistant Director and the OES Lieutenant positions
from the current plan.
Restructure Top Command
Providing appropriate and effective
command level leadership has been an ongoing concern at DPS for some time. The
Assistant Director position was created to help in this regard. During the
budget reduction submittal process, and given the magnitude of the City’s
budget crisis, we proposed to eliminate the position of Assistant Director in
favor of maintaining most of the current command structure, though other viable
proposals existed. After further discussions with your office and with DPS
personnel, it was decided that the best alternative involved a further
flattening of the organization through elimination of the Captain II command
level and the addition of another Assistant Director position. We believe this
proposed structure will provide more accountability and better-coordinated
command and control, and will provide more compatibility with the public safety
model.
We submitted a revised budget
reduction proposal which reflected these changes and generated a budget savings
of approximately $112,000. This proposal was included as part of the budget
savings for DPS.
The proposed structure includes two
Assistant Director positions, elimination of the Captain II command level
(equating to five positions), and the addition of two Captain I positions. Any
further reduction of positions would have the following effects on department
operations:
- The current management span of
control is too broad for effective command. Eliminating one or both of these
positions from the plan would result in all of the Captains and the civilian
managers reporting directly me or to the one remaining Assistant Director.
The "two assistants" model provides the ideal organizational
structure with operational responsibility on one side and administrative
responsibility on the other with an approximately equal number of direct
reports.
- The cadre of management personnel
at DPS has been historically low compared to our neighboring peer cities.
While this condition is good from a budgetary point-of-view, the Department
has suffered in its ability to provide adequate management oversight and
mentoring regarding line personnel. Eliminating one or both of the Assistant
Director positions will terminate the positive impact the proposed
restructuring will have on leadership with the Department.
- The current plan to realign the
Captains by functional area and eliminating the Captain II positions at the
program level is directly tied to the hiring plan for the Assistant
Directors. This is not a service enhancement. The layers of management
remain the same in Police and Fire Operations. This move consolidates
responsibilities at a higher level in the organization. On the
administration side of the Department it more clearly addresses the span of
control issue, as Dispatch, Records, Property/Evidence, analytical staff,
hiring, selection, training, OES, Crime Prevention, vehicle abatement, etc.
are now consolidated under a unified command. By setting up the organization
in this way we are returning to a clearer "public safety"
management model with all police and fire operations under the control of
one executive officer.
- Eliminating one or both of the
positions from the plan will take away the opportunity we have for positive
impact in the area of mentoring. A fully developed organizational structure
puts in place senior management staff to whom others can look up to and
learn from. The proposed structure also provides the Director with an
Executive Committee of the top three ranking members of the Department to
develop policy and form the core of the leadership component of the
organization. The Assistant Chiefs will provide needed leadership for the
Captains under their control, many of whom are new in their positions and
require development and mentoring. Effective management practice at this
level will foster good management practices between Captains and
Lieutenants. I see this as an essential component that is absent from our
current organization. This structure will provide a clear career path. In
time it will evolve into an effective command and control setup that works
as well in administrative processes as it does in our long history of
superior performance when responding to calls for service.
Elimination of OES Lieutenant
- Eliminating the OES Lt. position
could have a negative impact on the SNAP program. We have worked hard to
revive this program and feel that eliminating the Lt. could have a negative
impact on the momentum we have generated. This momentum is important to us
because of our current focus to strengthen the City workforce component of the
broader OES effort. Further, we hope that success in these areas will put is
in a position to revive programs (upon Council direction) aimed at the
remaining two constituent groups that are currently not getting our attention,
commercial businesses and the schools.
- The importance of planning and
executing a citywide drill is at the top of our priority list for this
function. Eliminating this position will seriously threaten this effort.
Moreover it is essential that this training be as effective and meaningful as
it can be. Eliminating this resource, especially the sworn position, will
affect the quality of this essential training exercise.
- The issue of "rebuilding"
as a "service expansion" assumes a limited view of this position.
The OES Lt. is an important program administrator whose duties go far beyond
SNAP. The Lt. is responsible for the EMO and its effective application. The
Lt. handles the reporting for the function, in addition to developing and
managing grant funding opportunities. In that regard, we play a role in the
Santa Clara County Grant Approval Authority. Involvement with this group
requires local and regional coordination responsibilities.
- We have found that having a sworn
officer in this position is essential to the effective participation in
regional cooperation efforts such as the one mentioned above. There are many
reasons for this, including the operational interface between other police
agencies and fire departments. Even within our own organization, like running
the EMO, it is clear that command experience, credibility in the community and
a "real world" perspective are essential ingredients it effective
emergency management. Losing this position means that we lose these essential
interface components.
- The Lt. in this position has done a
good job to revive the program. I would like to see this effort to continue to
evolve to the point where it is a stop on the career path for officers wanting
to promote up through the ranks. We are well on our way to making this a
reality by the current work being done by Lt. Lamar.
I hope this answers your inquiry. If
you have questions, please contact me by cell phone.
Back to RTC
attachment