SunnyvaleRTC

Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2004/05 Transportation Development Act. Article 3. Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding

The Calabazas Creek Trail Project consists of trail and bridge construction along Calabazas Creek, providing bicycle and pedestrian access north of Mission College Boulevard to Old Mountain View Alviso Road.

List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way, construction, construction management, contingency). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments (make certain the use of the currently requested funding is made clear in the “Project Elements” section below, and include any other clarifying information on the next pg.)

Funding Source	All Prior FYs	Application FY	Next FY	Following FYs	Totals
TDA Article 3		$27,550			$27,550
list all other sources:
1. City of Sunnyvale	$52,000				$52,000
2. TEA 21 Grant	$381,000				$381,000
3. Other TDA Funds	$267,519				$267,519
Totals	$700,519	$27,550			$728,069

Project Eligibility:	YES?/NO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," on the next page provide the approximate date approval is anticipated).	Yes
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on the next page.	No
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/chapters/t1001.htm).	Yes
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation on the next page).	Yes
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (If “NO” provide and explanation on the next page; and note that MTC cannot allocate funds to a project which lacks environmental clearance).	Yes
F. Will the project be completed within the three fiscal year time period (including the fiscal year of funding) after which the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and year) December 2005	Yes
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: )	Yes

Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2004/05 Transportation Development Act. Article 3. Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding

The Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Project includes the design and construction of a bicycle footbridge on Mary Avenue over Interstate Route

280 in the City of Cupertino, providing a bicycle and pedestrian connection between the cities of Sunnyvale and Cupertino in a bikeway corridor on Mary Avenue between Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard.

Funding Source	All Prior FYs	Application FY	Next FY	Following FYs	Totals
TDA Article 3		$44,305			$44,305
list all other sources:
1. City of Sunnyvale	$65,695				$65,695
2. City of Cupertino	$750,000				$750,000
3. State of California	$500,000				$500,000
4. VTA Bicycle Expenditure Plan	$5,440,000				$5,440,000
Totals	$6,755,695	$44,305			$6,800,000

Project Eligibility:	YES?/NO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," on the next page provide the approximate date approval is anticipated).	Yes
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on the next page.	No
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/chapters/t1001.htm).	Yes
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation on the next page).	Yes
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (If “NO” provide and explanation on the next page; and note that MTC cannot allocate funds to a project which lacks environmental clearance).	Yes
F. Will the project be completed within the three fiscal year time period (including the fiscal year of funding) after which the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and year) October 2006	Yes
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: City of Cupertino )	Yes