APPROVED MINUTES
SUNNYVALE CITY COUNCIL

August 23, 2005

 

The City Council of the City of Sunnyvale adjourned from a 5:00 p.m. Special Meeting – Closed Session regarding:

  • Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code 5495.6, Labor Negotiator: Erwin Young, Director of Human Resources; Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 715
  • Conference with Legal Council—Existing Litigation—Pursuant to Government. Code 54956.9(a); Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. vs. City of Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1-04-CV-017403
  • Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation—Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(a); Before the Public Utilities Commission  of the State of California; Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Authority to Institute a Rate Stabilization Plan with a Rate Increase and End of Rate Freeze Tariffs (U 39 E) – Application 00-11-038; Emergency Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 E) to Adopt a Rate Stabilization Plan – Application 00-11-056; Petition of The Utility Reform Network for Modification of Resolution E-3527 – Application 00-10-028

and met in regular session in the City Council Chambers, 456 West Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, California at 7:10 p.m., with Mayor Chu presiding.

 

SALUTE TO THE FLAG

 

Mayor Chu led the salute to the flag.

 

ROLL CALL

 

PRESENT:

Mayor Dean J. Chu

Vice Mayor Ron Swegles

Councilmember Fred Fowler

Councilmember Julia Miller

Councilmember John Howe

Councilmember Melinda Hamilton

Councilmember Otto Lee

 

ABSENT:

NONE

 

STAFF PRESENT:

Amy Chan, City Manager

David Kahn, City Attorney

Don Johnson, Director of Public Safety

Mary Bradley, Finance Director

Marvin Rose, Director of Public Works

Robert Paternoster, Director of Community Development

David Lewis, Director of Parks and Recreation

Robert Walker, Assistant City Manager

Charles Schwabe, Deputy City Manager

Trudy Ryan, Planning Officer

Pete Gonda, Sr. Management Analyst

Andy Miner, Principal Planner

Katherine Bradshaw Chappelear, City Clerk

PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS

 

  • Mayor Chu announced there was an item pertaining to the adoption of the Service Employee International Union (SEIU) Local 715’s Memorandum of Understanding and amendment to the Salary Resolution that was continued to tonight’s meeting, but the matter is not on tonight's agenda because negotiations are continuing and the item will be continued indefinitely
  • Councilmember Howe, on behalf of the Executive Director of Leadership Sunnyvale, announced they are still recruiting for new members and further information can be found on their website at www.leadershipsunnyvale.org.

 

CONSENT CALENDAR

 

Councilmember Miller moved and Councilmember Howe seconded to approve the Consent Calendar.  Motion carried unanimously 7-0.

 

1.A.

MOTION

Approval of Draft Minutes of Regular meeting of August 16, 2005

 

1.B.

MOTION

Approval of Information/Action Items – Council Direction to Staff

 

 

Fiscal Items

 

1.C.

MOTION

RTC 05-248

List of Claims and Bills Approved for Payment by the City Manager (List No. 260)

 

Staff Recommendation: Review list of bills.

 

1.D.

MOTION

RTC 05-255

Adoption of FY 2005/2006 Performance Audit Work Plan and Review of FY 2004-2005 Audit Work Plan Progress

 

Staff Recommendation: Council approves Alternative No. 1: Adoption of the proposed Performance Audit Work Plan for FY 2005-2006.

 

1.E.

MOTION

RTC 05-246

Authorization for NOVA to Apply for Rapid Response Special Projects Funding in the Amount of $245,720 to Respond to Changes in Employment Opportunities

 

Staff Recommendation: Sunnyvale City Council, on behalf of the NOVA seven-city consortium, adopts Alternative 1: Council approves submission of a proposal to the State of California for Rapid Response Special Projects funding in the amount of $245,720.

 

1.F.

MOTION

RTC 05-247

Authorization for NOVA to Submit Letter of Intent to Bay Area Workforce Funding Collaborative for Health Care Workforce Development Funding not to exceed $900,000.

 

Staff Recommendation: Sunnyvale City Council, on behalf of the NOVA seven-city consortium, adopts Alternative 1: Council approves submission of a Letter of Intent to the Bay Area Workforce Funding Collaborative to apply for health care workforce development funding not to exceed $900,000.

 

Contracts

 

1.G.

MOTION

RTC 05-249

Award of Contract to Conduct Performance Audits of Various City Programs (F0507-02)

 

Staff Recommendation:  Council awards a one-year contract, in substantially the same form as the attached draft and in an amount not to exceed $128,800 to Katherine F. Murdock to conduct performance audits of various City programs under the direction of the Department of Finance and approves delegation of authority to City Manager or her designee to execute an option to extend the contract for four additional years over the life of the agreement.

 

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

 

Vice Mayor Swegles reported that at the Closed Session held on August 23, 2005, at 5:00 p.m., there was:

  • Direction given, but no action taken, pertaining to: Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code 5495.6, Labor Negotiator: Erwin Young, Director of Human Resources; Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 715
  • No direction given and no action taken, pertaining to: Conference with Legal Council—Existing Litigation—Pursuant to Government. Code 54956.9(a); Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. vs. City of Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1-04-CV-017403
  • Direction given, but no action taken, pertaining to: Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation—Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(a); Before the Public Utilities Commission  of the State of California; Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Authority to Institute a Rate Stabilization Plan with a Rate Increase and End of Rate Freeze Tariffs (U 39 E) – Application 00-11-038; Emergency Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 E) to Adopt a Rate Stabilization Plan – Application 00-11-056; Petition of The Utility Reform Network for Modification of Resolution E-3527 – Application 00-10-028

 

 

CITIZENS TO BE HEARD

 

Mayor Chu opened the Citizens to be Heard at 7:15 p.m.

 

Fran Hirsch, Chair of the Sunnyvale Political Action Committee (SUNPAC), announced that the Sunnyvale Chamber of Commerce has withdrawn its sponsorship and they are now an independent organization.

 

Arley Marley, SUNPAC board member, stated goals and invited Councilmembers to serve on their board of trustees and offered to provide a written proposal for consideration; and referred the public to their new website www.sunpac.org.  Council questioned the City Attorney on the applicability of the Brown Act should three or more Councilmembers choose to participate.

Mei Ling Stefan, a member of the public, voiced her displeasure over actions taken at the council meeting on March 29, 2005 relating to a cellular pole, and asked Council to reconsider its decision.

 

Harriett Rowe, a member of the public, voiced her opposition to the conversion of industrial land for use by churches and schools as places of assembly.  Staff confirmed to Council they are working on a study issue related to a moratorium and/or developing a policy on places of assembly.

 

There being no further public testimony, Mayor Chu closed Citizens to be Heard at 7:30 p.m.

 

Mayor Chu announced that agenda Item Nos. 2 and 4 under Public Hearings/General Business were inadvertently noticed for 8:00 p.m. and would be deferred until after that time and that Council would now hear Item No. 3.

 

 

PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS

 

3.

MOTION

ORDINANCE

NO.

RTC 05-253

Study Issue:  Extending Approval of Wright Avenue Single Story Combining District and Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code Provisions Related to the Single Story Combining District.

 

Staff Recommendation:  Council allows applications to be filed up to six months prior to expiration and reduces the fee (to one-half) for applications to reinstate the expiring combining district.

 

 

Andy Miner, Principal Planner, presented the staff report, with additional information presented by Robert Paternoster, Director of Community Development, and responded to questions from Council regarding: procedures, costs, staff time involved, clarification of sunset provision, historic district standards, impact on neighborhoods, and existence of similar districts in other cities.

 

Mayor Chu opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.

 

Lou Wertz, a member of the public, stated the two-story home in his neighborhood was a massive invasion of privacy; expressed his opinion that 55% of property owners being required to support a rezoning application is too high; that the reapplication fee should be eliminated; and responded to questions from Council regarding other Eichler homes in the area and the actual number of signatures that would be required.

 

Wilma Anderson, a member of the public, voiced her opinion that common sense and guidelines were ignored when the two-story house was allowed to be built next to an Eichler home and that 67% was too high.

 

Mary Simkin, a member of the public, stated she was traumatized by the two-story house, encouraged Council to eliminate the sunset provision; and responded to questions from Council regarding the landscaping she had installed.

 

William Callahan, a member of the public, expressed his concerns regarding a potential gap in the process if they have to wait until the expiration date to reapply;   the anticipated fees per household in 2008; and stated he found the Planning commission recommendations acceptable.

Gretchen Callahan, a member of the public, stated the neighborhood is unique and requested Council protect it for future generations.

 

Public testimony completed - Mayor Chu closed the public hearing at 8:09 p.m.

 

Council directed questions to staff regarding: clarification of sunset provisions; reduction of percentages required to support rezoning request; calculation of future fees; other districts in City; current code provisions; reducing application time period from nine months to six months prior to expiration; waiving fees; different standards for different zones; and disclosure requirements to potential buyers.

 

Councilmember Hamilton moved and Councilmembers Fowler and Miller jointly seconded to accept the Planning Commission recommendations to: eliminate the sunset provision of the single-story combining district; allow applications for the existing single-story neighborhoods to be filed up to nine months prior to the expiration date; eliminate a fee to reapply for the single-story district; and reduce the minimum number of owners of property required to support a rezoning application from 67% to 55%.

 

Councilmember Fowler offered a friendly amendment to allow the two existing districts to be able to apply immediately.  Friendly amendment accepted; however, on the advice of the City Attorney, the friendly amendment was withdrawn.

 

Councilmember Lee offered a friendly amendment to change the minimum number of owners required to support a rezoning request from 55% to 60%.  Friendly amendment not accepted.

 

Councilmember Fowler offered a friendly amendment to change the time for applications to be filed from nine months prior to expiration to one year.  Friendly amendment accepted.

 

The motion carried unanimously 7-0.

 

RECESS CITY COUNCIL

 

Mayor Chu called a recess at 8:44 p.m.

Mayor Chu reconvened the meeting at 8:53 p.m. and stated that item No. 2 would be heard next.

 

2.

 

MOTION

RTC 05-254

Appeal of a Decision by the Planning Commission Approving a Use Permit to Accommodate an Expanded Library, Computer Lab, Administrative Building, and Construction of a Sanctuary, with a Condition Limiting the Allowable Number of People on Campus After School Hours to 200 on a site Located at 1030 Astoria Drive (near S. Bernardo Ave) in a P-F (Public Facility) Zoning District

 

Staff Recommendation:  Council grants the appeal and approves the Use Permit with modified conditions and number of people on campus.

 

 

Trudy Ryan, Planning Officer, presented the staff report and, with the assistance of Robert Paternoster, Director of Community Development, responded to questions from Council regarding: the permit process, legal nonconforming use; the synagogue on site; characterization of activities and uses allowed; services available; history of school; and student enrollment; types of events and attendees; other private schools in City; parking; traffic management; other activities and businesses in area; hours of usage; and proximity of residents.

 

Mayor Chu opened the public hearing at 9:22 p.m. and asked the applicant/appellant to come forward.

 

Rabbi Avi Schochet, applicant, announced that the school and its neighbors had reached an agreement and invited neighborhood representative, Ashok Saraf, to come forward and together they presented the joint list of conditions of usage, replacing the conditions set forth in Section 3C and 3D in Attachment B (Planning staff’s Recommended Conditions of Approval – Use Permit) and went over key points: maximum enrollment; maximum number of attendees at 8 special functions; hours of operation; and designation of a City liaison.  They also addressed other issues: use of the school's parking lot by park users; City access to the park through school property; and responded to questions from Council regarding: history of the school, curriculum; sanctuary; use of facilities by outside community service groups; school activities; administrative uses; use of the Kosher kitchen; social activities; bicycle parking; and traffic management.

 

Sam Cramer, a neighbor whose children attend the school, informed Council that Jewish people are strictly forbidden to drive on the Sabbath and addressed issues regarding:  enrollment; parking and use of the school's parking lot by visitors to the park and convalescent home.

 

Ytai Cezana, a member of the Synagogue, spoke regarding the number of cars using the parking lot; parking lot shading requirements; and eliminating item 13 of Attachment B.

 

Morey Schapira, a 26-year resident whose children attended the school and past-president of the school involved with the Use Permit application in 1996; informed Council that not all of the traffic management and parking issues are school related; that San Antonio Park, the convalescent home and the jr. high school contribute to problems with traffic and noise and the school should not be asked to bear the entire cost of traffic calming measures; and he made the point that he has worked for years on a voluntary basis with Public Safety’s crime prevention unit.

 

Martin Stone, a resident of Palo Alto with two children attending the school, informed Council he walks from Palo Alto to services every Saturday; spoke regarding the use of schools for adult education classes and raised the following issues for the record: first amendment, due process, equal protection, abuse of discretion; and responded to questions from Council.

 

Queene Mavor, a neighbor, talked about the changes that have occurred in the neighborhood over the past 10 years, the importance of traffic management, and requested a study issue regarding San Antonio Park to add parking and restrooms.

 

Bosco Wong, a long-time neighbor who has seen the gradual growth and increased traffic in the area, is in favor of the school and does not oppose the renovation, but does oppose expansion, and instead of allowing 400 adults plus children at special events 4 times per year would like a solid number of people to be specified.

 

Cyndi Iwata, a neighbor, spoke regarding: limitation on functions that occur on campus; insufficient parking in the area; complaints to police about loud music; and would like a specific capped number of people allowed at special events.

 

M.L. Chan, a neighbor, spoke regarding: complaints about noise on the Sabbath and on Sundays; grandfathering of uses and expanded uses; and supports neighbors sharing the costs with the school for traffic mitigation measures.

 

Saeed Solymani, a neighbor, pointed out that as families expand so do the number of cars in each household.

 

Fred Zaghi, a neighbor with 3 children attending the school, stated he and his 11-year old child attend an adult evening class along with 10-15 other people; that a small percentage of the parking spaces are occupied on Saturdays; that the school's parking lot is used by people who visit the park and convalescent home; that their special events are comprised of students and their parents.

 

Randy Ehlers, a neighbor, appeared before the Planning Commission in 1996 and strongly supported the school’s plans; he stated the school has been a very good neighbor and he does not personally have a problem with noise or the large number of people attending the 8 special events held each year; he also spoke regarding: traffic and noise issues; uniformity with the landscaping; the need for additional parking in the neighborhood due to sporting events at the park and other businesses operating in the area.  Staff responded to questions from Council regarding the use permit.

 

Avi Kopelman, past school president, chair of construction committee, and a contributor to the agreement, stated they went through the negotiation process with the neighbors to clarify and resolve issues regarding parking, noise, traffic, and activities; and expressed his disappointment with the complaints that were being made to Council on issues that were addressed in their joint agreement.

 

Kacy Walden, a neighbor, expressed her concerns regarding expansion of uses and wants condition 1-Q to stay in effect as originally proposed.

 

Rena Solymani, a former student of the school, disputed testimony regarding expansion when enrollment is down to 250 from 354 maximum and disagrees with the numbers being used to compute attendees at events; and pointed out that the park and convalescent home contribute to the on-going traffic and parking problems.

 

Peiling Li, a neighbor, expressed her problems with loud noise and activities that continue past 10:00-11:00 p.m. which disturbs her children who are sleeping or studying; and understands the need for the school to expand but would like to see some restrictions in place.

 

Don Benoti agreed with his neighbor Peiling Li regarding problems with noise late at night and is concerned the school may expand the uses of its kitchen into catering activities such as weddings and believes there needs to be limits imposed.

Jean Pierre Brown, a neighbor, commented on the good communication that took place between the school and the neighbors to reach an agreement and encouraged Council to vote its approval; informed Council that two adults would be present at each event and the neighbors have been provided with phone numbers to use regarding noise problems; invited the neighbors to their barbeque; discussed their reluctance to lock into a fixed number for special events; went over some details of their remodeling plans; and responded to questions from Council.

 

Public testimony completed - Mayor Chu closed the public hearing at 11:30 p.m.

 

After the close of the Public Hearing, Councilmember Miller moved and Vice Mayor Swegles seconded, to complete this item and then re-schedule the two remaining items on the agenda to a special Council Meeting on 8/30/05 at 7:00 p.m. 

 

Motion failed 2-5 with Councilmembers Howe, Hamilton, Lee, Fowler and Mayor Chu dissenting.

 

Continuing on with Item 2, Council addressed questions to staff regarding: conditions of approval, use permit, proposed language by applicant; carpooling; bicycle parking classifications; traffic control management; and agreement presented by neighbors and school.

 

Councilmember Lee moved and Councilmember Miller seconded to approve Alternative No. 2: Council grants the appeal and approves the Use Permit with modified conditions and number of people on campus substituting Section 3C and 3D in Attachment B (Recommended Conditions of Approval – Use Permit) with Items A-P pages submitted by the neighbors and the applicant items A-P, with the following adjustments:

 

1.Q. to read:  After project implementation, applicant shall be responsible to cover the cost of striping Astoria Drive if deemed appropriate by the Transportation and Traffic Manager.

 

2.D. to read: As modified by Planning Officer

 

6.A to read: Work with City staff to identify and negotiate a permanent emergency access route for City vehicles along western property line to San Antonio Park.

 

10.0 to read: At least 50% of the new portion of the parking lot shall be shaded at 15-year growth of trees.

 

13.A  - delete parking/circulation conditions.

 

14.A to read: Provide 23 bicycle parking spaces with a combination of  Class I (bike lockers which protect the entire bicycle) and Class II (bicycle rack).

 

18.A  to read: Develop a Transportation and Parking Management Plan (TPMP) for high volume activities (in excess of 200) people, with the exception of regular school hours) and submit to the Director of Community Development for final approval.  TPMP must be approved and in place prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit.

 

Councilmember Howe offered a friendly amendment to remove 1.N (Recommended Conditions of Approval – Use Permit) regarding construction hours and allow default to existing City policy.  Friendly amendment accepted.

 

Councilmember Hamilton offered a friendly amendment to include language that the use permit covers a school with an enrollment up to 354 students (pre-K—Grade 8) and associated uses and activities connected to the school, including the place of worship.  Friendly amendment accepted.

 

Vice Mayor Swegles offered a friendly amendment that the school provides the neighbors with telephone numbers for contact purposes.  Friendly amendment accepted.

 

Motion carried unanimously 7-0.

 

 

RECESS CITY COUNCIL

 

Mayor Chu called a recess at 12:00 midnight.

Mayor Chu reconvened the meeting at 12:05 a.m. and continued the meeting with item No. 4 on the agenda.

 

 

4.

MOTION

RTC 05-252

Appeal of a Decision by the Planning Commission to Approve a Design Review to Allow a New Two-Story Home and an Attached Accessory Living Unit for a site located at 694 Conway Road (near Hollenbeck) in an R-2 Zoning District.

 

Staff Recommendation:  Council upholds Planning Commission decision and approves with conditions.

 

 

Trudy Ryan, Planning Officer, presented the staff report and responded to questions from Council regarding: appeal letter; items Council should consider in making its decision; variances; other 2-story homes in area; prior owner; municipal code requirements; maximum square footage; parking requirements; unauthorized removal of tree.

 

Mayor Chu opened the public hearing at 12:25 a.m. and seeing that appellant was not present asked the applicant to come forward to make a statement.

 

Ying Wong, the designer and applicant, went over the proposed design features.

 

Applicant declined to make a closing statement and there being no further testimony, Mayor Chu closed the public hearing at 12:28 a.m.

 

Staff responded to questions from Council regarding: parking on Conway; emergency vehicle access; private road issues; square footage of new home; and the unauthorized tree removal.

 

Vice Mayor Swegles moved and Councilmember Miller seconded to approve Alternative No. 3:  Council grants the appeal and denies the design review.

 

Motion failed: 2-5 with Councilmembers Howe, Lee, Fowler, Hamilton and Mayor Chu dissenting.

 

Councilmember Lee moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to approve staff recommendation Alternative No. 1: Council upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and approves the Design Review with conditions as recommended by staff

 

Councilmember Miller offered a friendly amendment to reduce the Floor Area Ratio to 55.  Friendly amendment not accepted.

 

Motion carried: 5-2 with Vice Mayor Swegles and Councilmember Miller dissenting.

 

5.

MOTION

RESOLUTION

NO.

ORDINANCE

NO.

RTC 05-251

Application for Related Proposals on a 22,213 square-foot Site Located at 926 South Wolfe Road (near Primrose) in an R-0 (Low-Density Residential) Zoning District.

  • General Plan Amendment low density residential to low-medium density residential
  • Rezone from R-0 (Low-Density Residential) to R-1.5 (Low-Medium Density Residential) Zoning District.
  • Design Review to allow four new single-family homes, and
  • Parcel Map to subdivide one lot into four lots

 

Staff Recommendation:  Council approves with conditions.

 

 

Trudy Ryan, Planning Officer, presented the staff report and responded to questions from Council regarding clarification of zoning districts.

 

Mayor Chu opened the public hearing at 12:48 a.m. and asked the applicant to come forward to make a statement.

 

Kam Li, applicant, stated he accepts all the conditions recommended by staff and responded to questions from Council regarding the landscaping plans.  Council questioned staff regarding tree removal.

 

Applicant declined to make a closing statement and there being no further testimony, Mayor Chu closed the public hearing at 12:51 a.m.

 

Staff responded to questions from Council for clarification.

 

Councilmember Howe moved and Councilmember Hamilton seconded to approve staff recommendation Alternative No. 1: Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Introduce an Ordinance regarding 926 S. Wolfe Road to:

  1. Amend the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Low Medium Density Residential;
  2. Rezone from R-0 to R-1.5; and
  3. Approve the Tentative Map and Design Review with conditions

Motion carried unanimously 7-0.

 

 

NON-AGENDA ITEMS & COMMENTS

 

COUNCIL:

Vice Mayor Swegles suggested a discussion at a later date concerning the current 11:00 p.m. meeting closure and that applicants be advised that items may be continued to another meeting.  Mayor Chu acknowledged that Councilmember Howe had brought up this matter several months earlier and Councilmember Howe re-stated his support.

 

Vice Mayor Swegles announced that he and the Mayor were appointed honorary Naval Reservists at the Military Sports Day held Tuesday morning at Moffett Federal Air Base.

 

Councilmember Miller stated she contacted the owner of Oasis Mobile home Park and went out and inspected the park and found no evidence of the debris the speaker testified at last week's meeting existed.

 

Councilmember Miller inquired about the status of cleaning up Hendy Avenue.  Mayor Chu indicated that the City Manager would provide an update as part of the Friday Report.

 

Councilmember Miller inquired about and received from staff an update on the status of the demolition of the mall.

 

STAFF:

None

 

INFORMATION ONLY ITEMS – Received and Filed

 

  2005 Tentative Council Meeting Agenda Calendar

  RTC 04-250 Appeal of Planning Commission Agenda of August 8, 2005 and Administrative

    Hearing Agenda of August 10, 2005

  Unapproved minutes of Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of 8/10/05

  Summary of August 16, 2005 Study Session – Housing Programs

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business, Mayor Chu closed the City Council meeting at 12:59 a.m.

 

 

 

Katherine Bradshaw Chappelear

City Clerk