October 25, 2005

 

 

SUBJECT:     Joint Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Proposed Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Central Core Redevelopment Project Area to update the Plan and increase tax increment collection for the plan

 

 

REPORT IN BRIEF

 

The Redevelopment Plan for the Central Core Redevelopment Project was adopted in 1975. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sunnyvale is now proposing a plan amendment to restate the Redevelopment Plan to conform to current redevelopment law and to increase the limit on the total amount of tax increment that the Agency may receive over the term of the Plan. The proposed Amended Plan will provide for sufficient tax increment to make redevelopment of the Town Center Mall feasible, will allow for necessary public improvement projects, will increase the Redevelopment Agency’s ability to repay existing debt obligations, and will facilitate redevelopment of the Central Core Redevelopment Project in a manner consistent with the General Plan.

 

The Planning Commission adopted a resolution finding that the proposed Plan Amendment conforms to the General Plan and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board.

 

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance adopting the Amended and Restated Plan.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The City of Sunnyvale’s Redevelopment Project area was first established in 1975 to alleviate the conditions of blight affecting the central business district and adjacent residential and commercial areas.  At the time of establishment of the Central Core Redevelopment Plan, there was no limit on the amount of tax increment that could be collected. It was anticipated that the Agency would receive tax increment throughout the life of the project. However, in 1986 the Plan was amended to conform to SB 690, which set a limit on the amount of tax increment the Redevelopment Agency could receive unless the plan is subsequently amended. On December 23, 1986 (RTC 86-671) Council adopted an ordinance setting $118 million as the limit. In establishing the $118 million cap figure, staff tried to anticipate the total amount of funds needed from tax increment to complete the downtown redevelopment project.

 

The 1986 projection of $118 million is no longer realistic and did not anticipate the redevelopment of the Town Center Mall nor the redevelopment of Town and Country Village. It is anticipated that the Agency will reach the tax increment cap in FY 2014/2015 considering only the Mall development. This is 13 years before the end of the project. If the cap is not increased, the Agency would be in a position to lose $116 million in tax increment revenues and the redevelopment of the blighted Town Center Mall area will be jeopardized.

 

On May 17, 2005 the Redevelopment Agency (RDA 05-007) took the first step in the process for the Plan Amendment by adopting a resolution authorizing staff to distribute the Draft Amended and Restated Plan and Preliminary Report to all affected taxing entities, the City Council, and various other interested persons and entities as required by law. The Preliminary Report provided background information to the Agency and taxing entities affected by the proposed Plan Amendment. Agency staff distributed the completed Preliminary Report and draft Plan Amendment to affected taxing agencies for their review.

 

On September 13, 2005, the Sunnyvale City Council and the Redevelopment Agency authorized a joint public hearing of the Council/Agency to be held on October 25, 2005 to consider adoption of the proposed amendment.

 

On September 14, 2005 staff mailed out notices of the joint public hearing by first class mail to all property owners, business owners and tenants in the Redevelopment Area and by certified mail to all taxing entities.

 

Staff conducted a community meeting on October 3, 2005, to explain the proposed amendment to property owners, business owners and tenants and answer questions that they might have. Approximately 10 people attended this meeting. The residents generally asked questions about background information on the Redevelopment Agency, the Redevelopment Plan, and the redevelopment of the Town Center Mall.

 

The plan amendment was referred to the Planning Commission on October 10, 2005 for its report on General Plan conformance and its recommendations to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board regarding approval of the amendment. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Plan Amendment, finding that the proposed Plan Amendment conforms to the General Plan.

 

EXISTING POLICY

 

The Redevelopment Implementation Plan states:

Goal 1 - Meet the Agency’s Existing Financial and Administrative Obligations.

Goal 2 – Establish the downtown as the cultural, retail, financial and entertainment center of the community, complemented by employment, housing and transit opportunities.

 

The Fiscal Management Sub-Element 7.1C.1C.4 states: Tax Increment – For improvements required to increase future tax base and where rehabilitation or redevelopment is required.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The main purpose of the proposed Amended Plan will be to provide the Agency with additional financial resources to alleviate remaining blight conditions in the Project Area and complete eligible projects such as the Town Center Mall redevelopment.

 

To effectively continue to implement redevelopment activities and alleviate blighting conditions within the Project Area, an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan is necessary to increase the total amount of tax increment that can be collected over the term of the Plan to $600 million or the plan will end prematurely and before the Agency can complete blight alleviation activities.

 

The attached document, “Report to Council”, serves as the Report on the Amended Plan, as required by Sections 33352 and 33457.1 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. The Report is a public document designed to provide comprehensive information to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency, the community, and taxing entities affected by the proposed Amended Plan. It documents the reasons for amending the plan, the blighting conditions within the Project Area, redevelopment projects and activities, method of financing and financial feasibility. It also documents the Agency’s adherence to the legal requirements for amending the Plan.

 

The second purpose of the Amended Plan is to restate, in its entirety, the Central Core Redevelopment Plan initially adopted by the City Council in 1975. The Restated Redevelopment Plan will update and conform the Plan to meet current redevelopment law, and incorporate the past six amendments into the Plan. The Restated Plan has been prepared by the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law of the Sate of California, and will not change the Redevelopment Project Area, or grant any different authority to the Agency, and will facilitate redevelopment in a manner consistent with the General Plan. (Attachment C).

 

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

 

As part of the Downtown Improvement Program Update, the City prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report (“the Program EIR”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) to consider and analyze the environmental impacts related to the Project, including adoption of amendments to the Land Use and Transportation Element of the General Plan, the Downtown Specific Plan and the Zoning Code. The Program EIR was certified by the Council at its June 17, 2003 meeting (Resolution No.123-03), where Council found that it presented an adequate assessment of the environmental impacts of the Project, and adopted a statement of overriding considerations, and adopted a mitigation monitoring program. The City has prepared an addendum to the Program EIR, dated June 25, 2004, to assist in the City’s review of the Town Center Mall portion of the Project (the “Addendum”). The Addendum found there was no need to prepare a subsequent environmental impact report under CEQA guidelines Section 15162. Likewise, the proposed amendments to the Redevelopment Plan are components of and consistent with the Project analyzed in the Program EIR and the Addendum. Since the time the Addendum was prepared, there have been no changes to the environment or the project and no new information has become available which would require additional environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168.  The Redevelopment Plan Amendment is subject to the Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted by the Council for the Project.

 

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The Agency had previously appropriated $135,000 for the Redevelopment Plan Amendment project  for consulting fees, legal fees, noticing costs, and other related costs (August 12, 2003, RDA 03-007/Project No. 824430); $96,695 has been spent through FY 2004/2005. The remaining budget of $38,305 will be carried over to FY 2005/2006 to complete the project. 

 

If the proposed amendment is ultimately adopted, it is estimated that the Agency will realize $116 million in additional tax increment revenue over the life of the project considering only the Mall development, and considerably more if the Town and Country and other projects are redeveloped. The Additional Tax Increment that the agency receives as a result of the increase in the Tax Increment cap will be used to pay cost associated with the redevelopment of the Town Center Mall, primarily to replace the now closed public parking. If the tax increment cap is not raised, the Agency will not be legally able to make scheduled debt service payments to the City after reaching the existing cap on or about FY 2014/2015. It is projected that approximately $80 million in outstanding loans to the City General Fund and approximately $5 million in outstanding bonded indebtedness would remain unpaid at that time.

 

 

Conclusion

 

The proposed Amended Plan will enable the Redevelopment Agency to implement the goals of the Redevelopment Plan and to alleviate significant remaining blight within the Project Area and should have a positive financial impact on the Redevelopment Project area and those properties located within the Project Area. The Amended Plan will be in conformance with the City’s General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance, which will be the governing land use documents for the Plan, as they currently exist and may be amended in the future.

 

 

PUBLIC CONTACT

 

Public contact was made through posting of the agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, posting of the agenda and report on the City’s web page and the availability of the report in the Library and the City Clerk’s Office.

 

Legal Notice of the hearing is published once a week for four successive weeks prior to the public hearing. A copy of the Notice was sent to each property owner in the Redevelopment Project Area as shown on the last assessment roll and a copy of the Notice was sent to each occupant of each address in the Redevelopment Area, thereby providing additional notice to businesses and residents in the Project Area. Additionally, a copy of the Notice was sent to all of the appropriate taxing entities by certified mail or hand delivery. Staff has called each taxing entity to discuss the plan amendment, and met with the School District representatives on September 20, 2005 and with County representatives on October 21, 2005. The County has submitted a written objection to the Amended Plan (Attachment D).

 

 

ALTERNATIVES

 

1.    Adopt the attached ordinance of the City Council approving the Amended and Restated Plan for the Central Core Redevelopment Project Area.

2.    Do not adopt the attached ordinance of the City Council approving the Amended and Restated Plan for the Central Core Redevelopment Project Area.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative #1.

 

The Amended Plan is consistent with the General Plan and the vision for revitalization of the Project Area. The proposed $600 million Tax Increment cap will provide for sufficient tax increment to make redevelopment of the blighted Town Center Mall feasible. In addition, it allows for future necessary public improvements, such as street improvements and public parking. It will also permit the Agency to repay approximately an additional $65 million of debt to the General Fund, and will allow for the redevelopment of the Project Area as envisioned in the General Plan.

 

 

Reviewed by:

Robert Paternoster

Director, Community Development/Secretary, Redevelopment Agency

Prepared by: Brice McQueen, Manager, Redevelopment Agency

 

Reviewed by:


Mary Bradley

Director, Finance/Treasurer, Redevelopment Agency

 

Approved by:


Amy Chan

City Manager/Executive Director, Redevelopment Agency

 

Attachments

A.  An Ordinance of the City Council

B.   Report to Council Part 1 and Part 2 (.pdf)

C.  Amended and Restated Plan (.pdf)

D.   County Letter (.pdf)