|
Elizabeth
Steward, resident re-introduces herself from the last Heritage meeting.
She noted that she has submitted her application for this Commission and
that her appointment to City Council is on June 16. The Mayor and
Commission welcomed her to the meeting. |
| 4. |
COMMISSION
OLD BUSINESS |
|
None |
| 5. |
COMMISSION
NEW BUSINESS |
|
A. Review
proposed application fees for FY 2003-2004 |
|
Steve Lynch, Associate Planner,
summarized RTC 03-192 and stated the proposed fees for Heritage
Preservation. The commission went over the report and stated no objection
to the proposed fees.
|
|
Chair Shoemaker noted that the proposed
fees seem reasonable and noted no objection to the proposed fee increases.
She asked staff regarding the Landmark Alteration fees from $68 dollars to
$150 dollars and what the increase is based on. Steve Lynch explained the
basis of the increase.
|
|
Gerri Caruso,
Principal Planner, stated that this fee for time extension of a Landmark
Alteration permit is not common. |
|
Gerri Caruso,
Principal Planner noted about Landmark Alteration Permits. She stated that
the permit would apply around the Murphy district or a Historical
Landmark. |
|
Mayor Miller
stated that RTC 03-192 (proposed application fees FY 2003/2004) was
discussed in last night's City Council meeting. She noted that the City
Council would like the Heritage Commission's input on the fees relevant to
Heritage Preservation Commission to City Council meeting on June 17. |
|
She asked staff
what fees are relevant to Heritage Preservation Commission. Staff
responded that the Mills Act Contract Request fee that is a new proposed
fee and the Landmark Alteration Permit which is an existing fee. |
|
Mayor Miller
thanked the Commission for taking the time to accommodate her in this
meeting. Comm. Mc Queen thanked the Mayor for attending. |
|
|
Comm. McQueen made
a motion to approve the proposed new Mills Act Contract Request Fee
and the increase fee for Landmark Alteration Permits for Fiscal Year
2003/2004. Comms. Reid seconded |
|
|
|
Motion carried 4-0
with Comms. Love, Pang and Rau absent. |
|
| 6. |
COMMUNICATIONS (10 minutes) |
|
A. Murphy Avenue Streetscape Discussion
|
|
Steve Lynch,
Project Planner, presented the existing Streetscape in the Murphy
district. He noted that the existing streetscape is a random montage of
what Murphy is today. He noted that downtown businesses would like an
increase in outdoor seating to a common location. He stated that staff
recommended moving the street furniture such as benches and the trashcans
to accommodate outdoor dining to a common location. Mr. Lynch further
asked the Commission for their historical perspective regarding this issue
on streetscape. |
|
Comm. Mc Queen
commented that he would like to discuss the issues but would like to see
the Murphy Avenue Design Guidelines before submitting a formal suggestion
regarding streetscape. |
|
Chair Shoemaker
stated that she understands the demand for outdoor dining. She also noted
that, by exploring other cities, outdoor dining can be intrusive on the
sidewalk area, although, she would like to see more space for outdoor
dining in a controlled manner. However, she would not like to hamper this
type of development. |
|
Comm. Hopkins
asked staff if there are any regulations on the type of outdoor furniture
that businesses can have outdoors. She noted that Palo Alto has rules
regarding the type and color of outdoor furniture which businesses may
have. |
|
Staff responded
that a policy was adopted to have wood or metal furniture. She further
noted that, since it was only a policy and not in Sunnyvale Municipal
Code, that businesses started to use plastic furniture for less loss
liability and easier storage. She noted that due to the common practice of
using plastic furniture, the City let the businesses use dark green
plastic furniture. |
|
Chair Shoemaker
asked if a permit is required to have outdoor seating, and if so, then
these codes needs to be enforced. Staff replied yes, and that this is why
staff is asking this Commission for their input. |
|
Comm. Mc Queen
noted that he was in favor for more outdoor seating since businesses would
want more seating outside to attract customers. He further noted that
despite his being in favor of outdoor dining, he would like to look over
the Murphy Avenue Design Guidelines before he submits any formal
statements for outdoor dining |
|
Comm. Hopkins
asked staff what the restaurants' potential is to put an outdoor patio
area. Staff responded that there is no space to accommodate for outdoor
patio areas. |
|
Steve Lynch,
Associate Planner, noted that the planters are the second issue along
Murphy Avenue. He noted that removing the planters is suggested by Public
Works because many of them have been damaged. He asked the Commission what
are their views regarding removal of the planters in place of better
landscaping to accommodate more space. |
|
Comm. Hopkins
noted that if outdoor seating permits, then having planters to divide
outdoor dining to visually separate and divide outdoor dining among
restaurants is her idea. She further noted that planters are probably
favored since people like to sit outside to be around nature. |
|
Comm. Mc Queen
noted that the planters are nice looking for downtown. He noted that he
would not like to see all of the planters disappear. |
|
Chair Shoemaker
commented that if there is a problem with the existing planters, then more
maintenance should be invested in them. She stated that the City usually
maintains landscaping in a better manner than usual. She noted that she
would not like to see the planters go away. |
|
Staff noted that
there might be more interruptions with outdoor seating between businesses
if the planters stay because of space control. |
|
Steve Lynch,
Associate Planner, noted the third and final issue that staff is asking
input on are for the existing "A" frames on Murphy Avenue. He
noted that a Landmark Alteration Permit is required to have an
"A" frame in the rear of the restaurant only. |
|
Comm. Mc Queen
noted that all of these issues are pointing to space accommodation on
Murphy. He suggested to maybe permanently close Murphy Avenue to vehicle
traffic. Staff responded the history of the idea of closing the street.
Gerri Caruso, Principal Planner, noted that floating the idea around again
is a good way to get that suggestion around. |
|
|
The remainder of
the agenda will be continued to the next meeting due to this
evening's special Planning Commission meeting regarding project
# 2002-0612
- City of Sunnyvale Downtown Plan, General Plan Amendments and
Environmental Impact Report. |
|
|
B. Staff
Follow-up
C. Continue Developing Outreach
Objectives
D. July 2, 2003 |
| 7. |
ADJOURNMENT |
|
|
Comm. Hopkins made
a motion to adjourn. Comm. Reid seconded. Motion carried unanimously
4-0 with Comms. Love, Pang, and Rau absent. |
|
| The
meeting adjourned at 8:04 p.m. |