CITY OF SUNNYVALE
REPORT
Planning Commission
|
SUBJECT: |
2003-0491 - Moshe Mendelson and David Mark [Applicant/Owner] - Application for a project site located at 953 South Wolfe Road in an R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District (APN: 211-50-001): |
|
Introduction of Ordinance |
Rezone from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential/Planned Development) |
|
Motion |
Special Development Permit to allow the development of 7 townhomes |
|
Motion |
Tentative Map for the subdivision of one lot into 7 townhouse lots and one common lot. |
REPORT IN BRIEF
|
Existing Site Conditions |
Single family residence; to be removed |
|
Surrounding Land Uses |
|
North |
Multiple Family residential |
South |
Single Family home; Zoned R-3 |
East |
Single Family homes across Wolfe Road; Zoned R-3 |
West |
Multiple Family residential |
|
Issues |
Number of stories Driveway width |
|
Environmental Status |
A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. |
|
Staff Recommendation |
Approve with Conditions |
![]() |
PROJECT DATA TABLE
|
EXISTING |
PROPOSED |
REQUIRED/PERMITTED |
|
|
General Plan |
Residential Medium Density |
Same |
|
|
Zoning District |
R-3 |
R-3/PD |
Rezone |
|
Lot Size (s.f.) |
15,561 |
Range from1,127 to 6,951 |
8,000 min. |
|
Lot Width |
79 |
22 |
120 min. |
|
Gross Floor Area (s.f.) |
2,416 |
16,750 |
No max. |
|
Lot Coverage (%) |
14.8% |
34.2% |
40% max. |
|
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) |
14.8% |
108% |
No max. |
|
No. of Units |
1 |
7 |
8 max. |
|
Density (units/acre) |
1 |
20 |
24 max. |
|
Meets 75% min? |
NA |
83% |
75% min. |
|
Bedrooms/Unit |
NA |
3 |
--- |
|
Unit Sizes (s.f.) Including 2-car garage |
2,416 |
Unit 1 1,991 Units 2-5 1,967 Unit 6 1,963 Unit 7 1,920 |
N/A |
|
No. of Buildings On-Site |
2 |
1 |
--- |
|
Distance Between Buildings |
50 |
NA |
20 min. |
|
Building Height (ft.) * |
16 |
32.5 |
30 max. |
|
No. of Stories * |
1 |
3 |
2max. |
|
Setbacks (facing prop.) |
|||
|
-- |
20 |
20 min. |
|
-- |
24 Including "pop-outs" |
12 2nd fl. min. |
|
-- |
10 Including "pop-outs" |
9 2nd fl. min. |
|
-- |
20 |
20 min. |
|
Landscaping (sq. ft.) |
|||
|
-- |
4,855 |
3,112 min. |
|
-- |
694 |
425 min. |
|
-- |
3,287 |
2,975 min. |
|
-- |
470 |
400 min. |
|
-- |
25 |
10 ft. min. |
|
Parking |
|||
|
-- |
18 |
18 min. |
|
-- |
17 |
17 min. |
|
-- |
None |
NA max. |
|
-- |
1 |
1 min. |
|
-- |
14 |
14 min. |
|
-- |
20 |
24 min. |
|
-- |
TBD |
2 min. |
* Items that do not meet minimum development standards
ANALYSIS
Background
Previous Actions on the Site: There were no previous planning applications related to the subject site.
Description of Proposed Project
The applicant seeks approval of a Rezone, Special Development Permit and Tentative Map to develop 7 townhouse units. Implementation of the project will require the demolition of an existing single family home. The project site will take access from Wolfe Road. The project site is located on the west side of Wolfe Road between Maria Lane and Gary Avenue.
Environmental Review
A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. An initial study has determined that the proposed project would not create any significant environmental impacts with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. (See Attachment 3, Initial Study).
An acoustical assessment was conducted by Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc. regarding the potential for noise impacts on residential units closest to Wolfe Road. The assessment concluded that interior and exterior noise levels along Wolfe Road would not exceed City noise standards provided:
MITIGATION MEASURE:
Rezoning
Change Under Consideration: Rezone the 15,561 square foot site from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential / Planned Development). The R-3/PD Zone allows up to 24 du/acre, and is compatible with a General Plan Designation of Medium Density Residential.
Objective: To allow for the development of 7 attached townhouse units. The proposed Planned Development Combining District allows for deviations from certain development standards.
Discussion: The applicant is seeking a Rezone of the subject property from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3/PD (Medium Density Residential / Planned Development) to allow the development of 7 townhouse units. The subject site is relatively small for an R-3 development and flexibility on building height is necessary in order for the project to achieve sufficient density to meet the Citys 75% density goal.
Planned Development: A property may be Rezoned to include the PD Combining District. The PD Zoning enables the consideration of deviations from the Code and/or imposition of more restrictive requirements.
The purpose of the Planned Development Combining District is to provide modifications, additions and limitations to other zoning districts to meet special conditions and situations. In 1998, the City Council approved guidelines for the use of PDs and Special Development Permits (SDPs). The subject request for a PD meets all of the three applicable established guidelines.
The project involves a complete redevelopment of the project site. In order to design a residential project on a relatively small lot of this type, certain deviations will be necessary to allow for design elements such as a three story building and narrow driveway access. Deviations required of the project are discussed in the following section of this report.
Special Development Permit
Use: The proposed project would displace an existing single family residence with a residential townhouse type project. The proposed townhomes are consistent with the uses allowed for the R3/PD (proposed) Zone within which the site is located. The proposed project attains a density of 20 du/acre (83%), meeting the Housing and Community Revitalization Sub-element goal of providing 75% of the maximum density allowed.
Site Layout: The project will consist of a single building containing 7 residential units. The proposed driveway will be located along the southern edge of the property providing access to garages and open parking spaces. Each unit will have a private open space area located behind (along the northern boundary) the building. A common open space area will be located at the west end of the project site.
The building will front onto Wolfe Road from which vehicle access will be taken. The main entry to unit 1, located closest to Wolfe Road, will face the street adding a pedestrian feel to the project. Entries for the remaining units will be taken from the vehicle driveway.
The applicant is seeking a deviation for the driveway aisle width of 20 feet where a minimum of 24 feet is required. The minimum distance between the building and the property line is 26 feet; however, the configuration of building articulation and landscape planter design limits the driveway width to 20 feet in a few locations. Public Safety/Fire Prevention staff have reviewed the plan and will accept the proposed 20 foot driveway width provided the project incorporate an on-site fire hydrant. The applicant has agreed to this requirement.
Surrounding uses include multiple family and single family residential development. A single home is located on the adjoining lot to the south of the project; similar to the project site, this property is also Zoned R-3 and is expected to redevelop at that density sometime in the future. An apartment building is located immediately north of the project. Separation between the existing apartment buildings and the proposed project will vary from approximately 58 to 82 feet. A driveway and fairly dense landscaping intervene between the existing apartment buildings and the project structure. The combination of screening and separation between structures will significantly reduce potential privacy impacts associated with development of the project.
The proposed creation of townhouse lots will result in lot area and lot width dimensions of less than those required by the Municipal Code. The project will result in lot area that vary from approximately 1,127 to 6,951 square feet where the minimum required is 8,000 square feet. Proposed lot widths will vary somewhat but will be as narrow as 22 feet where the minimum required for the R-3 Zone is 120 feet. Such deviations are common in the creation of townhouse projects and, staff believes, are a reasonable application of the PD (Planned Development) Combining District.
The following Guidelines were considered in the analysis of the project site design.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Site Layout) |
Comments |
|
City-wide Design Guidelines B1. Locate site components such as structures, parking, driveways, walkways, landscaping and open spaces to maximize visual appeal and functional efficiency. |
An entry and stairs for unit 1 located along Wolfe Road provides an attractive view for residents and the traveling public. Common open space provides an area that is not visible from the nearby street. Internal circulation is simple and efficient. |
Architecture:
The project will consist of a three-story, residential townhouse development with a stucco exterior finish and tile roof. There is considerable building articulation breaking up wall planes on all building sides. Building details include brackets, exposed rafter ends and various overhangs. Fences will separate private open space areas.
Building colors within the project have been enhanced in response to comments received from the Commission at its Study Session on July 28, 2003. In addition, exposed rafter ends have been pulled back to enhance longevity as suggested by the Commission.
The building façade incorporates numerous pop-out and extension details. Some of the extensions project into the side yard setback which, as an architectural feature, is permitted by the Municipal Code
The applicant is seeking a deviation for building height as the structure will be three stories and 32.5 feet in height. Current development standards for the R-3 Zone limit structures to two stories and 30 feet in height. Building height deviations are not uncommon in the R-3 Zoning District as it is difficult to meet the minimum density requirement of 75% and provide required parking, open space and site circulation in a two story structure; particularly when townhouse style development includes 2-car garages. Staff believes that due to the quality of the architecture, private open spaces, common open space and other amenities provided by the project, the proposed building height deviation is justified.
The following Guidelines were considered in the analysis of the project architecture.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Architecture) |
Comments |
|
City-wide Design Guidelines II Building Design Buildings shall enhance the neighborhood and be harmonious in character, style, scale, color and material with existing buildings in the neighborhood. |
The proposed structure incorporates architectural details, (e.g. Pop-outs, extensions and tile roof) and exterior colors that are compatible with surrounding development. The three story scale of the building is similar to other buildings in the area. |
Landscaping:
The existing landscaping on the project site has not been well maintained and will be removed to accommodate development of the site. Of the existing trees on site, four are large enough to qualify for the Citys Preservation Ordinance. Of these, two trees located toward the rear of the site will be removed. The remaining two trees located at the front of the project site will be preserved.Landscaping required of the development will include additional trees, ground cover, and clusters and rows of bushes.
As proposed, the project provides 470 square feet of usable open space per unit where a minimum of 400 square feet is required. A patio area is located at the rear of each unit which varies in size from approximately 320 to 700 square feet in area.
The R-3 Zone requires a minimum total landscape area requirement of 425 square feet per unit. With 694 square feet per unit, the project provides sufficient landscaping to exceed the minimum required.
The following Guidelines were considered in analysis of the project landscaping.
|
Design Policy or Guideline (Landscape) |
Comments |
|
City-wide Design Guidelines A4 Properly landscape all areas not covered by structures, driveways and parking. |
All areas not dedicated to structures, driveway or access requirements will be landscaped. |
Parking/Circulation:
The project will provide two enclosed parking spaces per unit and four unenclosed spaces. One accessible parking space will be provided near the project entrance on Wolfe Road. Parking provided meets all current requirements. There are a total of 18 spaces provided where 18 are required.Solid waste disposal for this project will require individual toters be moved to the street frontage for pickup. Public Works has determined that the toters cannot be placed in the street against the curb but rather must be set above the curb. This will require a redesign of the sidewalk as an additional three feet must be available to park the toters. Condition of Approval No. 9 requires a redesign of the sidewalk/curb design to accommodate solid waste removal. No curbside parking will be permitted along the street frontage in front of the project. As an informational note, limited curbside parking is allowed immediately north of the project site; no curbside parking is permitted south of the site.
As noted earlier in this report, the applicant is seeking a deviation for driveway aisle width. The project aisle ranging in width from 20 to 24 feet; the minimum width required is 24 feet. The irregular shape of the proposed landscape planters and the articulation of the building results in varying width of the drive aisle. Public Safety/Fire Prevention has reviewed the proposed access and has deemed it acceptable provided a fire hydrant is located within the project along the drive aisle. The precise location of the hydrant will be subject to review and approval by Public Safety (See Condition of Approval No. 29).
The current site plan does not show proposed bicycle storage. Condition of Approval No. 26 requires that bicycle parking be provided on site per VTA standards.
The following Guidelines were considered in analysis of the project parking and circulation.
Undergrounding: All utilities and service-drops will be placed underground.
Tentative Map
General: The project proposes the subdivision of the existing parcel into 7 townhouse lots and one common lot. The common lot will be in common ownership and will be maintained by a Home Owners Association.
Access: Vehicle will be provided to the project site from Wolfe Road. Adequate circulation is provided for access to facilities within the project site.
Right of Way: All required dedication for public right-of-way will be provided by the project.
Compliance with Development Standards
The following deviations are requested by the proposed project.
|
Requested Deviations |
Justifications With limited land available for residential development, there are limited opportunities to fulfill General Plan Goals for providing more housing units, easing the jobs/housing imbalance, and providing affordable housing. The proposed project helps to fulfill these goals. Higher-density development promotes the use of mass transit (the project site is served by Route 26 which extends from the Eastridge Transit Center in San Jose, through Sunnyvale Town Center to the Lockheed Martin Transit Center). The project enhances the aesthetic appearance of the area, making it more appealing for future residential development. Ownership housing opportunity.
|
Expected Impact on the Surroundings
The proposed project will result in the replacement of existing single family home with a medium-density residential project which is consistent with the development patterns within the local neighborhood. No significant impacts on surrounding properties are expected.
Findings, General Plan Goals and Conditions of Approval
Staff was
able to make the required Findings based on the justifications for the Rezone, Special Development Permit and Tentative Map.Fiscal Impact
No fiscal impacts other than normal fees and taxes are expected.
Public Contact
|
Notice of Negative Declaration and Public Hearing |
Staff Report |
Agenda |
|
|
|
Alternatives
Recommendation
Alternative 1
Prepared by:
Fred Bell
Project Planner
Reviewed by:
Gerri Caruso
Principal Planner
Reviewed by:
Trudi Ryan
Planning Officer
Findings - Special Development Permit
Land Use and Transportation Element
C2.2 Encourage the development of ownership housing to maintain a majority of housing in the City for ownership choice.
Housing and Community Revitalization Sub-Element
Policy C.1 Continue efforts to balance the need for additional housing with other community values, such as preserving the character of established neighborhoods, high quality design, and promoting a sense of identity in each neighborhood.
Goal D Maintain diversity in tenure, type, size and location of housing to permit a range of individual choices for all current residents and those expected to become city residents.
The proposed project will complement existing medium and high-density residential development in the area and will encourage the transition from industrial use to residential.
Findings - Tentative Map
The approving authority shall deny the Tentative Map if it makes any of the following findings:
That the subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed type of development.
That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
That the design of the subdivision or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
That the map fails to meet or perform one or more requirements or conditions imposed by the "Subdivision Map Act" or by the Municipal Code.
The subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the objectives, policies, land uses and programs of the General Plan. The project, in conjunction with an approved Special Development Permit, meets the overall density allowed in the zone and supports a land use that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The project also meets the goals and polices of the General Plan, as enumerated above.
Conditions of Approval - Special Development
In addition to complying with all applicable Federal, State and local rules and regulations, including the Sunnyvale Municipal Code the permittee expressly accepts and agrees to comply with the following conditions of approval for this permit.
General
- Permit development of lots of less than 8,000 sq. ft. in area.
- Permit lot widths of less than 120 feet.
- Permit a maximum building height of 32.5.
- Permit a three story structure.
- Allow a minimum 20 wide drive aisle.
a. A tree protection plan shall be submitted for existing street trees to be preserved on-site as identified by the City Arborist.
b. Any protected trees, (as defined in SMC Section 19.94) approved for removal, shall be replaced with specimen trees of sizes defined by the City Arborist.
c. Ground cover shall be planted so as to ensure full coverage eighteen months after installation.
d. All areas not required for parking, driveways or structures shall be landscaped in accordance with applicable Title 19 code requirements.
e. The project shall provide funding for the installation of street trees as required by the Department of Public Works.
f. Provide storm water infiltration to landscaping areas from roof drains; show method on plans prior to issuance of a building permit.
g. Landscaping shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration, and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides than can contribute to water pollution.
Parking
Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring
Noise Mitigation Monitoring:
Who: Applicant shall submit evidence of compliance with the mitigation measures listed above in the form of detailed plans submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. Required testing to ensure compliance with the maximum interior and exterior noise levels permitted will be provided at the applicant's expense, and results of the testing will be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development.
When: Prior to issuance of a building permit and prior to occupancy.
Fire Prevention
Public Works
Conditions of Approval - Tentative Map
A. Planning Division
The Tentative Map shall be valid for a period of two years, measured from the date of approval by the final review authority.
The Tentative Map shall be applicable only in conjunction with a valid Special Development Permit.
Building Permits for the lot or lots within a recorded Final Map may be issued only in accordance with a valid Special Development Permit.
Any proposed Deeds, Covenants, restrictions and By-Laws relating to the subdivision shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney.
At the expense of the subdivider, City forces shall install such street trees as may be required by the Public Works Department.
Prior to final approval of the Final Map by the Director of Public Works, the "In-Lieu Park Dedication Fee" shall be paid in accordance with MCS 18.10. Park Dedication Fees for the R-3 zoning district is $4,425.15 per unit. The Park Dedication Fees for this 7 unit project will be a total of $30,976.05.
B. Building Safety Division
Obtain Grading Permits as required (MCS 16.12.010).
Provide soils report prepared by a licensed soils laboratory (Res. 193-76).
Seal and cap all septic tanks and irrigation systems in accordance with Building Safety regulations.
C. Public Works
Record a Final Map.
Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, streets, utilities, traffic control signs, electroliers (underground wiring) shall be designed, constructed and/or installed in accordance with City standards prior to occupancy. Plans shall be approved by the Department of Public Works.
Connect to all City utilities or private utilities operating under a City franchise which provides adequate levels of service.
Obtain Public Works approval of plans for utility line extensions, utility connections, meter locations, driveways, sidewalks, etc.
The on-site drainage and sanitary sewer systems shall be privately owned and maintained. The fire and domestic water systems shall be privately owned and maintained beyond the meter.
Individual water services and meters shall be provided to each lot.
Construct all public improvements prior to occupancy.
Existing and proposed on-site and street frontage electrical, telephone and cable TV services shall be placed underground or removed prior to occupancy (MC 19.46.060).
Post labor/material bond and faithful performance bond for the full cost of all off-site public improvements (MCS 12.08.020).
Developer shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement and post bonds for all off-site work prior to action on Final Tract Map.
Dedicate public utility easements at lot frontages as required by the utility companies.
Installation of the water system shall conform to City standards and shall be part of the City (or franchised utility) system up to the master water meter serving the project. The water system shall be privately owned and maintained beyond the meters.
D. Fire Prevention
Comply with the Sunnyvale Fire Prevention Code (MC 2099-84; Title 19 of Calif. Admin. Code Sec. 1.12(l); UFC 1982 Edition).
The water supply for fire protection and fire fighting systems shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction on the site (MC 16.52.170).
E. Other Public Agencies
Pay School Tax fees prior to issuance of a Building Permit.