CITY OF SUNNYVALE
REPORT
Planning Commission

September 8, 2003

SUBJECT:

2003-0591 – Corinne Barkow [Appellant] Tosh and Teresa Kameda [Applicant] - Application for a 7,931 square foot site located at 1067 Lois Avenue in an R-0 (Low-Density Residential) Zoning District. (APN: 198-36-001);

Motion:

Appeal of a decision by the Director of Community Development approving a Miscellaneous Plan Permit for 6-foot high fence in the reducible front yard.

REPORT IN BRIEF

Existing Site Conditions

Single-Family Residential

 

Surrounding Land Uses

North

Single-Family Residential

South

Single-Family Residential

East

Single-Family Residential

West

Single-Family Residential

Issues

Safety

Neighborhood Aesthetics

Environmental Status

A Class 11 Categorical Exemption relieves this project from California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines.

Staff Recommendation

Deny the appeal and uphold the Miscellaneous Plan Permit approval.

 

03-0591 Image441.jpg (375936 bytes)

PROJECT DATA TABLE

 

EXISTING

PROPOSED

REQUIRED/PERMITTED

General Plan

Residential Low Density

Same

---

Zoning District

R-0

Same

---

Lot Size (s.f.)

7,931

Same

6,000 min.

ANALYSIS

Background

On August 5, 2003 a Miscellaneous Plan Permit was approved by the Director of Community Development to allow the construction of a six foot tall solid wood fence to be located in the required reducible front yard. (See Attachment 3, Site Plan and Fence Detail). A Miscellaneous Plan Permit is required for fences that are up to six feet in height and located in the required reducible front yard. No fence agreement with adjacent neighbors or posting of the property is required for this type of application. Posting the property and the 15 day appeal period is only required for fences in the front yard or the reducible front yard which are greater than 6 feet and less than 7 feet.

On August 19, 2003 the Miscellaneous Plan Permit was appealed by the adjacent property due to concerns about the location of the fence. (See Attachment 5, Letter of Appeal).

Description of Proposed Project

Location

The proposed wood fence would be located in the required reducible front yard located on the Plymouth Avenue side of the applicant’s property. There is no fence currently existing in this yard at this time. (See Attachment 3, Site Plan).

Design

The proposed fence would be 6 feet in height for a length of 24 feet in the reducible front yard area. It would be 6 feet high and 15 feet long along the rear property line. This smaller section of fence will tie into the existing 6 foot high fence along the rear property line. The proposed design is solid board-on-board construction. (See Attachment 3, Fence Detail).

Vision Triangle

The corner lot vision triangle is created by measuring 40 feet along each property line from the corner where the two street sides of the property line meet. Connecting these two lines with a diagonal line completes the vision triangle. The proposed fence is not located in this vision triangle. (See Attachment 3, Site Plans).

Environmental Review

A Class 11 Categorical Exemption for accessory structures relieves this project from California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines.

Compliance with Development Standards

The proposed fence meets the required driveway vision triangle requirements and meets the Single Family Home Design Techniques for fences.

Single Family Home Design Techniques

 

3.11.G. Side fencing may be solid wood boards, but open latticework segments at the top of the wall are softer in appearance and encouraged.

The fence is proposed to be a solid wood, board on board design.

3.11.G. For side property lines abutting a public street, low fencing is encouraged.

The proposed fence height would be six foot tall, but would be compatible with similar fences on similar lots in the surrounding neighborhood.

3.11.G. Chain link fencing is strongly discouraged.

The fence would be constructed from redwood.

Appeal

The appellant believes that the new fence would cause a safety hazard by blocking visibility of oncoming traffic. The appellant’s property fronts along Plymouth Drive and is two parcels East from the corner of Plymouth Drive and Lois Avenue. The appellant believes that the line of sight to this street corner, as viewed from their driveway, would be blocked by the new fence. This would make exiting the driveway in a vehicle difficult. The appellant states that cars regularly travel around this corner exceeding the allowed speed limit, which has created an unsafe situation. They are concerned that the proposed fence would further reduce the visibility of oncoming traffic and, therefore, compound the current unsafe situation. (Please refer to the appellant’s letters in Attachment 5 for additional details.)

Staff Discussion

Staff has determined that the safety of automobiles, pedestrians and bicyclists will be not by compromised by the addition of the fence. The fence is proposed to be build outside of the 40 foot vision triangle, which is what City code requires to ensure that there is adequate visibility at street corners. In addition, the fence will not be within the ten foot driveway vision triangle for the adjoining property.

The Traffic Department has not received complaints regarding speeding or traffic volume in this area and expects that there is a normal residential traffic volume. Although cars may occasionally exceed the allowed speed limit of 25 mph, there is not known to be a high incident of speeding in the area.

There are numerous examples of similar fences within the surrounding neighborhood that have also been approved by the City. Most of these are located on the reducible front yard property line, which is typically on the edge of the sidewalk. For the subject property, the property line is on the edge of the sidewalk, but the applicant is proposing to set the fence back one to two feet. This setback will provide an area for landscaping to help break up the appearance of the fence.

The applicant originally applied for a seven foot high fence. After discussions with Staff, the applicant modified their application to lower the high of the fence by one foot. Staff felt that a seven foot high fence was not characteristic of other fences in the neighborhood and was too tall to be located so close to the sidewalk. A condition of approval has been added in Attachment 2 that states the maximum height of the fence shall be six feet.

Findings, General Plan Goals and Conditions of Approval

Staff is recommending denial of this Appeal because the Findings (Attachment 1) for this Miscellaneous Plan Permit can be made. However, if the Planning Commission is not able to make the required Findings, Staff is recommending the Conditions of Approval in Attachment 2.

Fiscal Impact

No fiscal impacts are expected.

Public Contact

Notice of Public Hearing

Staff Report

Agenda

  • Mailed to the adjacent property owners of the project site
  • Posted on the City of Sunnyvale's Website
  • Provided at the Reference Section of the City of Sunnyvale's Public Library
  • Posted on the City's official notice bulletin board
  • City of Sunnyvale's Website

Alternatives

  1. Deny the appeal of the Miscellaneous Permit and uphold the decision of the Director of Community Development.
  2. Grant the appeal of the Miscellaneous Permit with the recommended conditions of approval.
  3. Grant the appeal of the Miscellaneous Permit with the modified conditions of approval.

Recommendation

Alternative 1.

Prepared by:

Steve Lynch
Project Planner

Reviewed by:

Fred Bell
Principal Planner

Reviewed by:

Trudi Ryan
Planning Officer

Attachments:

  1. Findings
  2. Conditions of Approval
  3. Site Plans and Fence Detail
  4. Photos of the Existing Site
  5. Letter of Appeal

Findings – Miscellaneous Plan Permit

The Director or Planning Commission may approve any miscellaneous plan permit, as it finds desirable in the public interest, upon finding that the permit will either:

  1. Attain the objectives and purposes of the general plan of the city of Sunnyvale

The project’s design and height meet the objectives and purposes of the General Plan of the City of Sunnyvale, as the proposed fence is not located within the 40 foot vision triangle required for corner lots and is constructed of solid wood boards. The project meets the objectives of the Sunnyvale Municipal Code and the "Single Family Home Design Techniques".

  1. Ensure that the general appearance of proposed structures, or the uses to be made of the property to which the application refers, will not impair either the orderly development of, or the existing uses being made of, adjacent properties.

The proposed project’s design and height is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and other existing corner lot fences in the immediate vicinity. The proposed use will not impair the existing use of the adjacent property, as the proposed fence is outside of the required 40 foot vision triangle area for corner lots and is also outside of the 10 foot driveway vision triangle area.

Back to Attachments

Conditions of Approval – Miscellaneous Plan Permit

In addition to complying with all applicable City, County, State and Federal Statutes, Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions, the Permittee expressly accepts and agrees to comply with the following Conditions of Approval for this Permit.

  1. The maximum height of the fence shall not exceed six feet.
  2. No hedges or other front yard enclosures are a part of this approval.
  3. The Miscellaneous Plan Permit shall expire in one year as measured from the date of the approval by the final review authority at a public hearing.
  4. This project must be in substantial conformance with the approved plans. Any major site and architectural plan modifications shall be treated as an amendment of the original approval and shall be subject to approval at a public hearing except that minor changes of the approved plans may be approved at the staff level by the Director of Community Development.

Back to Attachments

Back to 09/08/03 Agenda